|
![]() The hideous spectre of
climate-whatever-it-is-this-week stalks Florida
— @
3/28/19 I had the heat on! — got down to 62°! ... Oh why oh why did
that monster W not sign the holy kyoto
accords!!?!?!?! ... It is
largely because I don’t
like cold
that I am here
in the golden land
of beauty.
And yet the bitter days slip away. The totally unbiased nonpartisan Washington Post
claimed spring had sprung, but So I will curate my silly cameras, and pray for real global warming. (Which did come at last in June.) On
a more heart-warming note, behold this fellow’s booth Others: DSLR Silly cameras I II III IV V VI VII VIII Olympus C-3000 Kodak CX7330 Olympus D500L Fujifilm S8100 Canon A80 Canon G10 Canon A710 Canon A590 Olympus C4000 Spartus Slide Projector Canon A1300 Canon A720 Fujifilm E550 Kodak Z650 Kodak Z740 crummy Sony DSC-S90 Sony FD85 Kodak DX6340 Fujifilm S1000fd Olympus 410 Canon SD800 IS Canon A1000 IS Kodak DC25 FujiFilm S2950 FujiFilm S3800 FujiFilm s100fs Canon s20 Canon s10 Minolta Z5 |
And it does take beautiful 3mp pictures, throbbing brilliant nice and on super Stupid Media supplied from my special spider-wracked antique stock! 16Mb! 21 or so pix! And the battery is always almost empty. ... It's all so beautiful. And PC Magazine says in 8/00 it was $800 retail! ... Really, I have visited the sparkingly-scammy Olympus many times in these fascinating pages, and they do bring me joy. As will its lovely lens cap whenever it shows-up.... |
Sure, there was a little green stuff I cleaned-off from the battery contacts, and its totally-dead genuine Kodak EZ-scam rechargeable battery, which I will of course carefully preserve with the other zombies. But it leaped to life when I turned it on, took a picture, and it has a menu "Live View" setting which a previous pilgrim had set to Off so its batteries will not disappear in a few minutes! — but NO! — not a previous pilgrim but, the manual informs me, the default setting! ... Oh treasured ancient silly kodak. ... I mean it has still has its standard repertoire of scammery but, basically, harmless unless the buyer was paying attention — i.e. to figure-out the ridiculous "share" accessories etc. — which couldn't've done Kodak much good. ... But oh golly the enthralling wonderfulness when the stupid camera lights-up! — my tawdry existence is somehow justified, the world is made right, for a few hours in the morning. ... And it was only $140 in the day! |
— but wait (screeching noise)! ... It appears I will be saved from my antiquated luxury by amazon decadence, expressed in this case by their now typical inability to deliver anything promised "by 9pm". ... So sic transit gloria amazon. ... I guess I didn't want that silly old camera anyway.... |
And 1997 is hardly the earliest silly camera in the laboratory — my precious casios of yore will always outrank in that respect — well apparently my 2nd casio qv10a is contemporaneous, but anyway the glorious D500L is probably the oldest silly camera I can get pictures out-of, that is, actually usable — the qv casios stopped producing pictures through their loathsome rs232 cables some time around windows 98, hence their exclusion from the official silly camera herd.... But I'm disappointed — it was only $595 in 1998! I mean a whole megapixel or so for a lousy $600? ... But in 1999 it was call$ == priceless.... |
6/8/19. It is beautiful — but not perfectly preserved: there's vignetting at the wide angle, which is perhaps what it's trying to tell me when it proclaims a "lens error" at every power-on (dismissed by operating the telephoto control). Numerous impact adjustments — whacks on a table — didn't seem to help, although they did move the vignetting around a little. ... So now I'm seized with a compulsion to buy a working model for vast sums from amazon. And it turns-out the s8100's got IS oh precious tiny camera.... 11/21/19. My second S8100 is perfect & beautiful, and doesn't vignette horrible shadows in the corners. The LCD shows vertical streaks in sunlight, like my 1996 Casio, but unlike that, doesn't include 'em in the picture. (It turned-out I was supposed to flip a lever on the casio.) And the EVF probably doesn't show them, but I can't test just now since global-whatever-it-is-this-week has darkened my cold skies precipitously — nah, the EVF is the same, in a brief sunny interval. But the pictures are lovely.... And then it turned-out my S81002 came with a genuine Fuji proprietary USB cable which, sadly, requires proprietary fuji software which they sunsetted @ 8/19 — I missed the boat by a few months! It would only be of antiquarian interest — that's me! — but still, all is joyous and beautiful and I will treasure my S8100 with its precious IS and 18x zoom and useless proprietary USB cable.... And then I could download a copy of FPVInstaller.EXE from this harmless suspect, but the resulting program — surprise surprise! — didn't work. |
And it was only $20 or so in junk store America with the original box! ... $400 in the day! ... @ amazon 6/10/19 it's ~$30 prime! Apparently a popular little camera.... So that means my silly cameras include Canon "A" series A10, A20, A40, A70, A75, and now A80! ... Guess I gotta check-out the middle there — but apparently the A50 is a 1999 0.8mp camera, it's out of sequence! & it's a hideous battery-pack camera! No AAs! ... The A60 is the cruddy version of the A70, & costs too much at amazon, as does the A50, so I guess I can rest content now from my completedness frenzy.... The poor A80 is a little shy of perfection. With the flash, it's OK, but it's terribly dark without, making it one of few canons that didn't produce beautiful pictures out-of-the-box. ... Even my obviously-in-retrospect-broken A540 took beautiful pictures! |
... Now I'll see if the battery is, in a silly camera first, a duplicate. ... And Owen Scores! ... It is the same Canon NB-7L rechargeable as the broken 2010 SX30! ... So that sad defective junk wasn't entirely a waste! ... And I did check the G10 for broken pixels. ... This fellow paid $485 for a G10 in 2008. ... Whatever he says, the sx20 w/20x superzoom is really a better deal for ~$25 more in the used camera bazaars — although no raw! ... Whatever, a lot of geezers are apparently buying these silly things, not realizing the tremendous advantages of $uper modern ≥$1k $uper-cameras. Although the ~$500 "starter" DSLRs still remain.... |
... Dreamy Meditations ...I
am interested in the tension between the beloved & amusing past
versus the tawdry annoying present, and the A710
purchase
inspires
intense philosophical meditations in that area. ... So I was going to
swap my current "little" A1200
road camera
for the ur-silly 6mp A540
which, unlike the A1200,
has "enthusiast"
features, i.e. "real camera" shutter/aperture/iso
settings. ... But the owenlabs road kit already
includes the larger sx20
with all that stuff.
... Another A540
strange But
the A1200 is
smaller
than the A540;
it slips easily into
the pocket, what the "bulgy" a540 and others won't. And of course
the sx20
provides the "real camera" features like the extravagant 12mp
resolution — how could anyone possibly need
anymore?!?! — and Failing Dreams?But really I have failed
in my
rigorous silly analysis —
the camera-in-the-pocket is a characteristic And indeed I could instead even deploy the A710 with its svelte image stabilization; or even the upcoming A590! ... Or the even svelter A720! |
7/4/19. And it is a thing of joy & beauty! ... It's so cute; tiny little pretend camera with its somehow-imitation-real-camera bulging battery compartment. ... But only two AAs! And Image Stabilized! ... It's like a perfected version of my broken 2006 A540, which of course is what it is, and so shall I use it on my wandering journeys in light & shadow. ... It is the glorious completion of the a540's sad trail of brokenness & despair.... |
... Oh poor silly shirker! The pictures are lovely! ... Beautiful colorful, even the dark ones, even on their stupid media — perhaps especially, so I and the pitiful few other stragglers out there still using the stuff can form a cult, claiming stupid media is special, and takes better pictures — I mean, the chemical film guys do that, so why not!?!?! ... Especially fraudulent pixels, of ravishing beauty.... |
Of course I got a slide projector or two accumulated over the years, but none of 'em as cute as the Spartus. And I never got one of those monstrous relative-torturing machines so beloved of the aged in my youth and a constant source of consternation to them and amused relief to the snarling youth when the stupid things'd jam. ... @ 7/18, amazon's got a ~$520 "Kodak Carousel 4200 Slide Projector" which oddly does not include the projection lens! (?) ... They got plenty of slide viewers and of course digital scanners, but apparently the slide projector was so annoying it finally fell beneath the waves.... |
And
then I realized the A1300 is the successor to my beloved 2011 A1200,
what I had concluded was the furthest year of my pretensions. ...
8/2/19. And so be it! The a1300 is a silly camera too far.
It has no
mode wheel, lotsa pixels,
but shaky
... I mean the manual is one of those generic jobs covering 37 cameras — printing the things was too expensive....
|
Like the a590 and a710, it is an a540 owenlabs traveling camera replacement candidate, establishing a plethora of choice in my little antique kingdom. It's so gratifying — and cute! ... And it takes nice pictures — all the silly cameras with a few minor exceptions take nice pictures; even the broken ones! But
as my silly camera journey wanders on, I must admit some of the
cameras, particularly the "image stabilization" flavor like the
beautiful
A720, take more
nice pictures
— they're more likely, particularly with my beloved chiaroscuro
tendencies, to take an in-focus
pic. Except for the scam-o-rama ... Of course once I got the magic image stabilization, I had to figure-out how to turn the flash off — so I could take au naturel pix in available light without the tawdry tabloid flashing electronics.... |
It's got a resetting "display" control, which means the LCD'll probably be mostly on and the camera'll be limited to the usual few minutes of picture-taking. ... But it was $500 back when ... or maybe $400. ... Today's xD film cost more than the $10 camera — although the film was doubtless exquisitely pricy in the glorious rip-off days of yore, it was still probably less than the camera.... |
|
Lo! The light of light! The dawn came — the foolish curator had hopelessly sewn confusion by tragically deleting individual files (old laboratory backups) I found left-over on the 2Gb SD when I examined it @ the PC — oh Folly! O Remorse! ... Even worse, forensics suggest it might've been formatted to the evil nouveau FAT32, anathema to an innocent 2005 Kodak.... Reformatting to good ol' FAT16, taking another picture and, indeed, even copying the first picture back to the SD — and all seemed copacetic! And it remembered its EVF setting from before the deletion debacle and numerous power cycles! ... So it is a perfectly-formatted beautiful pitiful 5mp Kodak, oh Joy & Beauty & serene real photo-fan perfection.... $379 list? But Dpreview says it was $349 street price. The Moral of the Story of course is when a silly camera — of even today's $lendiferous $uper cameras — won't go, try removing the SD card first. With the PCs they always told us to disconnect all the peripherals to troubleshoot, which works great for laptops but was ludicrous with my enveloped-in-snaky-cables desktops. But the camera film should be simple.... |
So I'd guess the pitiful pilgrims paid something around $290 in the day, took the holiday/baby pictures, were sprung the cable scam, along with the film $cam, and threw the thing in a drawer awaiting the return of the king or perhaps the itinerant silly camera collector. ... And three of the three pix I took are jiggly. ... So I took two more, both jiggly; but actually one of the existing pix by some mischance wasn't jiggly. ... Ah well, the original purchasers, and me, will never know how jiggly their pictures were.... |
So the scammy "Memory Stick/Floppy Disc Adaptor" MSAC-FD2M
is $50 new @
amazon, which is really a scam too far for me. ... So I bought a $23
used one with
memory
stuck @ ebay which
I'm sure'll work gloriously. ... And it did! As noted elsewhere on this thrilling site, the Mavica was a huge hit, largely because of the floppy "film", and was a standard appurtenance at any real estate office in those ancient days.... |
And it advertises it's got an "indoor/outdoor" LCD display! ... The original sticker, which obscures the right-side of the LCD, suggests my impact adjustment may have been a decade or so late. ... And $248.99 @ 3/04..... |
|
But of course I have xD cards — a precious few, to be sure, and my 2gB size probably won't work, which is why the cards were not terribly expensive, but I shall see. ... And I did, and it worked good. While I was mercilessly bargaining the lady down, she assured me the thing worked, and I said I had numerous broken cameras — my beloved chimed-in in fervid witness. ... I mean, the majority of my silly cameras work, but still, there is a surging population of dead boxes. ... And this beautiful toy is one of them — until the $13 power supply I bought from amazon cures it.
Then I tried recharging the the original battery — which charged up good! And I can't be sure I didn't commit some misstep in my original charging attempts and so perhaps my $13 for the shim-requiring charger + 2 spare batteries was wasted, and the original seller was completely blameless! And it does take beautiful pictures.... |
The laboratory doesn't normally patronize this style of camera, with its proprietary rechargeable battery — instead of decent also-rechargeable but available-in-drugstores AAs — but the price was right and it opens-out the silly camera collection to countenance even Canon's sins. And there were idiots who actually preferred rechargeable. And the camera has some kind of magic feature within it that retains the date/time even when I removed the battery for its 4-hour charge..... |
But of course it takes beautiful pictures. And it is not one of those pretend-tiny-cameras; it doesn't look like a miniaturized DSLR. It looks like it'll fit in your pocket — a little better than the also-pocketable a1200 & a1300.... |
But it lives, it breathes, and I even have CR123A rechargeable NiMH batteries, what I got for my pitiful IS3DLX 35 mm film camera, and which were apparently a preferred pro-photo battery at the time — meaning, most probably, fraudulent pitiful foto-fan battery.... |
It came with another hitek µSD-SD-adapter special (like the A1000), which works in the camera but not in any of my SD usb readers. I did try filing the adapter plastic, which looks a little "high", in brutal vandalism, and then it was readable in a single reader, but still not the others in the herd. ... But really it's not a significant drawback; he who has not abundant SD cards should not hunt the wily silly camera. And I just realized at least one of my readers has a specifically µSD slot which didn't seem to work either after brief experimentation.
|
|
Tragically however, the kindly hitek guy didn't include the charger, although the listing faithfully promised one, demonstrating, no doubt, the horror of today's covid19 plague in all its appalling horror. ... Amazon's got 'em for ~$14 — but for May 1, no doubt a covid19-driven delay. And the hitek guy's obviously got one, 'cause he charged the thing up so I can revel in its real cameraness ... but only for a little while. But dpreview says the street price was $750! ... And the zoom control appears to be on the lens — i.e., one rotates it around, like a real camera! Indeed, the case is littered with real camera buttons and controls. Actually far more than my real camera. ... And it takes lovely pictures, and eventually, since the hitek guy couldn't be bothered, I bought a $30 gadget at amazon w/extra batteries what, amazingly, took only until May 1 to deliver.... Sat 11/6/21 10:35 am: I have neglected this lovely thing, one of whose shining attributes is, apparently, long charge life! I vaguely noticed that I kept picking it up and, as opposed to most of such random choices, it turned-on! ... And the rotating zoom lens thing really feels wonderful after all this button-pushing. So today I got it a 67mm lens cap, so I can leave it lying on its back without fear of dust on the lens. ... Of course it's giant, which is one of its charms no doubt, but restricts it to estate-tralling. ... And the sun just came out! |
|
And it came with the box and everything in it, numerous CDs, and an obvious 3rd-party case suggesting the usual sad tale of the elderly fellow who's passed into the beyond, his precious camera excavated for amazon. ... I got a pitiful scrawled note asserting the the author didn't make a profit as, I assume, a sort of apology for what the seller presumably guessed might be inadequacies. ... So the battery didn't charge, but then I used the exciting included cable which is supposed to run the camera directly from the charger gadget — and it didnt work! ... But I refrained from rending my garments, instead getting some super-fluid Deoxit and sploshing the little battery-like metal tabs, pushing it in and out a few times and — voila! Works like a charm! And now I have high hopes for the battery (disappointed), but I bought some more which'll show-up any month now, in amazon/covid time. ... I also went back in the past and got an s10! ... which uses the same battery/charger.... The "Street price" was $900! The PC Magazine review says $800.... And be sure to check-out contemporaneous cameras A10, A20. which were apparently the cheap seats (?!) — oh I see; they were different streams of model updating. The 1.3mp A10 debuted in 2/01, while the beautiful 2.1mp s10 was @ 11/99, a year and a mp ahead.... BatteriesAnother S/A divide is that the A10/A20 take common decent AA cells, instead of the costly proprietary rechargables. ... Indeed my beautiful A20 came to grief via battery rot — seemingly invalidating my obscure theories — and it's true enough, I've never had a proprietary rechargable battery rot on me, which is a plus. But the "S" cameras provided luxurious mp sizes unavailable until later models with AA batteries — that is, the "S" purchaser paid a premium for the extra mps, in the form of the stupid charger. ... And in our glorious covid19 era, rechargable AA nimh are readily available, and are obviously preferable to the proletarian AAs, since I've never had an nimh AA rot on me, like my poor A20 — which, to be sure, might have had nimh AAs in it, but I'll never know since the frozen battery compartment evades inspection. ... But if it did, it would be the first.... The proprietary cameras supposedly were smaller. And indeed, the proprietary-battery S20 is slightly thinner than the decent-AAs A20. But only slightly. ... And the S20's a megapixel ahead of the A20 anyway, so I suppose it's no comparison.... But then the A/S series contrast figures in favor of the A series anyway; even 'though I replaced my battery-frozen A20, I didn't have to beat the bushes to find the batteries, since they're everyday common decent AAs.... |
|
... And I suppose the silly camera aficionado should embrace & celebrate the shoddiness, in commemoration of the decades of scammy camera sales. ... And so I shall, innocently cavorting ... just as soon as I get around to it.... |