|
![]() ![]() 4/28/18. Sometimes I feel I’m closing in on the canons at least, but then sometimes I’m not at all sure. ... On the other hand, the camera biz is still going downhill, and I guess I take a guilty perverse pleasure in that — it’s not that I want all those lying incompetent retailers and web sites to be punished exactly — and really, if they were looking forward to a prosperous exciting career they presumably have already suffered much. ... Apple itself, with its iphone camera slayer, makes vast sums but not, sadly, stuff that “just works” anymore ... if it ever did. ... Ah ... it’s all gloom & despair — except for my adorable fiendishly-cute recently-antiquated cameras, even ’though some are broken.... Others: DSLR Silly cameras I II III IV V VI VII VIII Canon S1 IS Casio qv3000 Casio qv4000 Canon PRO90 IS Nikon S4000 Olympus SP320 Flip? Kodak Z981 Nikon cp4100 35mm! Vivitar 250/SL Polaroid pdc640cf Kodak C653 Sony DSC-P93 DSC-P93 Canon A470 Olympus D-360L Olympus C-4040 Kodak P850 Kodak CD33 Fujifilm S2000 Sony DSC-H7, H2 Canon A70, A10, A40 Bare Ruined Choirs ...5/28/18. The groves of silly cameras were silent ... empty ... in a thousand miles of junk! The usual offerings of rusting film devices continued unabated, but no delightful sprightly digital cameras in the bargain bins. ... It seemed the time of abundance had departed, persisting only at the Amazon & Ebay electronic bazaars — so far, I’ve found a single overpriced $50 Olympus silly camera with corroded AA cells. ... My statistical samples are crude no doubt, but it seems that @ 11/17 or so, all the digital camera junk was cleaned out of closets across the land and then — nada. ... But I will defy despair! ... Surely some more digital junk will show-up, someday. ... And then the Florida Oviedo Antique Mall came through @ 6/15/18, with three beautiful silly cameras which will no doubt lighten (or darken) my way — but still not an avalanche ... or even a little mud slide — a single store does not a silly cornucopia make. ... But then came the fall again, with silly cameras in whimpering abundance.... Buy Canon Silly CamerasI suppose I assumed it was obvious, but I will document the obvious here and note that Canon dominates the silly cameras, and today’s camera market such as it is — and the digital camera market past & probably future, world without end. ... All the enthusiast publications — that is, the paid bogus advertising of at least the other camera brands — pretend that it’s a tough competitive market, the glorious race to the swiftest, blah blah. Except of course the wholly bought and paid-for, like the British “brand” magazines which cannot have any unwholesome relations with their obvious sponsor. ... Anyway, the point is all these scammy journalists, mostly on the web today, they’ll pretend that any market is super competitive — if they didn’t, you wouldn’t read their bilge, so you wouldn’t click-through their tasty advertising, and they’d go out of bizness. Where, in the case of the digital cameras at least, they doubtless are going even as I blather....
|
Manual FocusBut I learned about the S1's MF Manual Focus button
which, conclusively,
didn't work either. But it's on my other
Canon zoomers, and does
something my DSLRs
won't do
Compulsory FlashAnother interesting peculiarity of the S1 is the flash was compulsory — I couldn't lift it up with my fingers like the subsequent models require, but it popped-up for the picture when I pressed the shutter halfway — although that could be suppressed by operating the flash button appropriately, if one remembered. ... After this zoomer, Canon obviously realized that accidentally not firing the flash was far less objectionable than firing it by mistake — at a museum, or a theater, or a funeral. And the non-auto-popup flash would've been cheaper. ... But my Canon DSLR pops-up in AUTO by default and makes a huge noise doing it, which frightened the poor amateur the first time. ... Although it can be lifted manually....
|
... I got it at the occasionally wondrous Cooper City Antiques, from whence in January four happy silly cameras came, but it was $95 which, even at the 1/3rd off proclaimed by a placard, was a bit steep, considering the extravagantly-corroded batteries I showed to a fellow wandering the store who seemed to take an interest and was apparently part of the owernship. So he suggested $20, and thus I have achieved broken antique digital camera satori. ... It isn't normal to encounter dickering opportunities, at least in our price-tag kind of stores, and for some perverse reason I'm still glad I wasted my $20, which shows I suppose what a devoted silly adept I am.... & this after spending skillful minutes dremelling off the battery rot. ... And it's true, I couldn't at first figure-out how to turn it on, pressing what I thought was the universal line-in-a-circle symbol, which turned-out to be the delayed-shutter button. ... And then at last I realized the LCD with bits of caption but mostly darkness — that was the camera's dead view. ... Sic transit gloria casio. ... And I think I remember this sad machine from the previous Cooper City visit, where no one with which to dicker presented itself, and I serenely passed on, little imagining our future entanglement, so tragic but relatively inexpensive. ... So to make-up for it, I bought a $35 qv4000 @ amazon.... |
|
And it works! At last ol' Oviedo came through ... at a bargain $6. ... And it takes beautiful pictures, as do all the silly cameras, except the totally broken (qv3000), and the occasional derelict like the non-focusing s1. ... And it's an educational contrast with my broken-CRV3-battery Olympus SP310 — well, actually, I guess the sp320 theoretically also could use a CRV3 — so it says on the battery compartment — but so far average NiMH AAs have lasted through 5 or ten power cycles! ,,, & it just produced a green "full battery" icon.... And the SP320's got raw, 'jes like the 310. And a viewfinder! ... It's probably a working version of the 310.... |
FlakeIn one aspect, sadly, the flips are not like the silly cameras: out of three laboratory units in original boxes, only two still worked. The tiny electronics in the third fell-over in the weary years, and would light-up, & hang-up. ... Even the dubious silly cameras — Olympus, Nikon — don't do that — well my pitiful nikon s4000, but that was certainly physical design incompetence, as are the numerous broken battery doors. The camera electronics & optics are astonishingly hardy. ... And many of my cameras, from the flips' ~2010 era, include video & even stereo sound ... and no touch screen.... But still, not as cute 'n' convenient as the flip, with its built-in USB connector to get the beautiful pictures out.... ![]() Vivitar DVR 410Then, as a sort-of sub-category of flip flake, we have the Vivitar "jello video" DVR 410. It has a much-inferior poke-out USB connector but, also, a removable SD card and an automatic-selfie flip-out screen!
... So I bought another for $22 @ amazon — which came in its original bubblepack, untouched by human hands, in all its startling pristine beauty — I probably can't bear to unpack it. ... I mean, amazon only promised "Colors May Vary". ... This is doubtless the natal packaging of my existing DVR 410, probably bought @ Walmart.... And in the fullness of time at least one of my menacing cloud of DVR410s has a battery failure mode where at end-of-life it turns itself on and beeps repeatedly piteously. It'll turn-off happily, and then do the same thing.... |
And it is lovely ... understated-ish, for some reason lower-rent-looking than the z990 — the raised "Kodak" on the lens cap isn't silver. ... But it doesn't have a broken pixel column like my other 14mp camera, the perfidious Canon SX30 ... although the z981 is CCD rather than the sx30's modérne apparently-dubious CMOS.... |
But sadly, it was a comedown: there's no "LCD" button! ... To turn-off the power-sucking "live view" beloved by all in 2004 — and now, for that matter, based on the relentless puffery — I'd have to use the setup menu — i.e., many more perilous keystrokes. ... And the test pic I took is kinda dark, but that's an EZ fix. ... So right, it has the same number of buttons as the 3100, they just traded the LCD button for a center "OK" button on the four-way arrow thing. No doubt some Nikon genius's idea of why Canon was so popular. The Danger ButtonOh I get it! That "LCD" button on the 3100 caused grief! The poor little aficionados'd return their 3100s 'cause the stupid LCD didn't light-up! ... 'Cause they pressed the stupid button! ... So, simple fix: get rid of the button & ensure batteries run out ril' fast with the beloved live view. Most camera purchases were used at a single celebration if that, & they probably wouldn't notice ridiculous battery failure for months, while the obvious LCD "failure" ... etc.... And such is the way of the silly cameras, ups & downs, shadows and sunlight, intelligence and of course beloved stupidity. ... But they still make lovely pictures.... |
But this is not one of the chosen. ... However, it lit up and the menus worked, which is more than I expected. But it doesn't take pictures, or see through the viewfinder, and its time is done. ... So I bought a $15 one from ebay. ... And it's really a pretty nice 3mp 2004 camera! Pictures are typically dark, but I can turn-off the "Live View" — which is the term the menu uses for it, despite its amazing discovery by DSLR scientists around 2008, and of course it's not really needed since there are no adjustments to make in any menu. But the turn-off feature, without which one's batteries evaporate far more rapidly, is missing from many grander & later cameras. ... And it was only $129 in the day! ... And it turns out I didn't buy it at Ebay, even 'though Bob's Cameras' box said "Ebay" all over it — it was good ol' amazon.... |
I fear I will remove the battery and leave it fallow, alone & afraid, hiding in some junk corner, peering without sentience at a harsh and unpitying world. ... But it's still got its AOL lanyard! ... And someday I may find a box with the camera and a CD and a cable — which still won't work.... |
... My dramatic resumption of 35 millimetering 26 years later was inspired when I was reviewing my foot-and-a-half of slides, to extract a selection for the apparently stygian darkness of the Kodak Box. ... Whether they come back or not, I was oddly impressed by the beautiful images! Mostly, in the first year 1977, of snow, which is what one mostly sees after October or so in the frozen North of upstate New York. I apparently got the camera just for that Great Adventure. And it probably cost >$200! I would set the ASA to the appropriate value, mostly 400 I believe, and then use the built-in meter to get adequate-exposure, and usually focus on infinity. The vast assortment of snow-covered garages, houses, cars and people did quite well that way, but even interior shots came-out good — although many have the wrong color, a trivial problem for the universal fixit. ... But this, children, is why light meters became essentially useless after 1977 or so, no matter what the idiot$ claim — the built-in meter was almost always obviously superior to an external unit. ... And the lens on the beautiful vivitar above? That's the lens of the unknown wide-angle, since the little metal thing fell-off years ago.... Ezier?The 250/SL is easier to use than my modérne (1995?) computerized 35mm IS-3DLX! This could have something to do with having taken about a thousand more pictures with the Vivitar, but it's also the simplicity: I don't have to figure things out. ... And possibly that's because I was born knowing about ASAs, exposure speeds, and f-stops and I suppose that isn't true of everyone, particularly the is3dlx target market. ... But whatever, it feels easier to me. It feels as if I have more control; with the automatic gadget, it may decide to take a picture when there's really not-enough light, so a longer exposure aka jiggling'll ruin it. With the 250/SL, I know that ahead of time.... The Darkroom4/1/19. And now I'll plug The Darkroom, with whom I have developed two rolls of totally-uninteresting 35mm film: a pitiful end-of-life 250/SL roll and, even before that, a roll from the idiotic-but-admirable is3dlx, on each occasion spending <$25 or so. ... There's a fellow in some junk store we go to in our endless wanderings — several times now! — who has leaped on the chemical-film / old-camera bandwagon, and I must admit I feel embarrassed to see his meticulous-looking spiffed-up film cameras what I would never buy in a million years. But of course I was there the first time; conceivably the youth of today, surrounded with all these spitting mean pixels, might obtain some solace from the antique way. Perhaps The Darkroom's future isn't dark.... |
And its pictures will never be seen. The device makes a satisfying "bonk" when I plug it in with a standard USB cable. But no more than that — there are no "drivers", the secret software sauce without which our beloved gadgets are silent and helpless. And looking for drivers will introduce the intrepid foto fan to an endless parade of the scintillating wonders of internet scammery — they are so happy to lie to you, in joyous mendacity — but no actual drivers. ... But there was a manual somewhere.... |
It's cute! I turn it on/off by sliding the lens cover,
see? And after drastic massagery with the psp9 fixit
feature, a
picture ... But then I realized how cruel & ignorant I was, and probably my problem was that after pressing the shutter, there is a significant delay until the camera beeps twice, and then the picture's taken! So I was probably jiggling it even for flash, i.e. pressing the button & imagining the picture was took, sad foto fan. ... Once enlightened with this wisdom, the pictures were a little better....
... But it is all carping; how long has it moldered in someone's drawer, and then, today, finally, taken pictures again!?!?! ... Actually I suspect there are pictures inside the camera, but like the Ezonics, they await a transcendent operating system beyond mortal camera users. ... And there was apparently a PDC640 + or something, which looks different and might well cure some of the sad things — although look! it's got StupidMedia! ... Ah the wonders of camera retailing.... |
... But behold However my A515 disgorged a lovely SD card filled with celebrations of a tiny tot's earliest years & festivals, which is how I uncovered its natal year of 2006, from the pix dates. Dpreview, my usual source for such info, rather shamefully scorns polaroids, no doubt sensing a hereditary enemy to the phony photo fan racket, as does the rest of the web, probably for other more-than-adequate reasons.... Renewal!11/17/18. And so it came to pass, that I got a beautiful A515 from ebay for a mere $30 — but with the original CD and other junk! So I didn't get a resurrected operating system, but at least I got the useless software! And I put the old SD in there and even the old much-battered batteries from my pitiful strivings, and all is well. ... Of course now I have to figure-out how the silly thing works. ... And it is stupid: slow, dumb menus, all the shoddy attractions — it's got 4x digital zoom! ... So the tiny tot pictures win hands-down. |
|
The silly collection includes a sister camera P100,
which is improved
with
proprietary charger scammery,
but the beautiful P93's got more modes —
|
But so far it works, and apparently it's got one of those super capacitors so it won't lose the date/time and other settings whenever you inspect the SD, although the time does seem to lose the minutes the batteries are out. ... But oh lookee, it's got a scam proprietary USB connector, so you gotta buy the scam proprietary Nikon USB cable, and that'd be why it's OK the SD card's so hard-to-get. |
Ahhh those golden days! ... The A470 is also uncommon in the laboratory silly collection, a Canon with no viewfinder, although I don't know for sure it'll run out of power in a few minutes. And the zoom works from the multi-button. ... It has a fake "M" manual mode, which does allow exposure compensation which is all we really need in this sad mortal world. ... Well, that and a viewfinder.... |
But, yes, it has a viewfinder, oh happy day! ... In that ancient era, they were regarded as obligatory, since using the obnoxious live view would indeed drain the batteries rapidly. But then somewhere in the creeping years they must've concluded the amateur camera buyer was too stupid to notice, and the viewfinders disappeared — and I suppose most of the stupiditariat couldn't use the esoteric thing anyway. ... The D-360L was apparently a popular camera for ebay sellers, just showing how ridiculous the megapixel fantasies are — a reviewer said the macro mode was great for ebay! ... Google was too stupid to let me link to their reviews — taken from ebay! — but I ferreted 'em out by googling "ebay olympus d-360L reviews" and they're here, slightly rearranged versus the google rendition.... |
... And according to the manual, the largest available StupidMedia was 32Mb! So you'd just have to buy lots. ... And now that I'm checking the laboratory's antique storage, the largest I got is 16Mb! I've got a number of two megabytes, which are incompatible with the camera, or so the manual says.... |
I thought maybe he/she was just confused about the USB cables, each a snowflake so diferent and incompatible, the better to confound the innocent victims customers after they'd lose the stupid thing and have to pay through the nose for another. ... But no; it must've been obvious it didn't work, 'cause the box didn't include a charger of course, so you couldn't've charged the thing up to discover it was broken, what it undoubtedly was already. ... But of course this omits the common silly camera surviving wife story, where she gets to pack-up the idiot's camera junk after he checks-out — so perhaps it was innocence. ... Oh the glittering brilliance of the golden age. ... The cable wasn't even the wrong proprietary junk; it was a standard µUSB, beloved of the amazon kindle among so many others.... So I blew $20 @ amazon on the proprietary charger / batteries / scammy USB cord. ... But the s4000's got a touch screen — a laboratory first! — well, excluding the home organ. ... And the glorious s4000 was only $200 new! And it's got no viewfinder, like most Nikon junk. The low price is why I bought them once or twice, the latest in the s4000 era but not of course with scammy rechargeable proprietary battery junk. Even in those innocent days, I'd check that first.... But it was all for naught! It's broken; powers-up, "lens error", turns-off. Impact adjustment didn't help. The thing looks in good shape, so it was probably in someone's drawer for months/years and then one day it stopped working. Or maybe when it was brand-new — with just-enough time to lose the USB cable. Or who knows. ... But I was starving for silly cameras, and foolishly went too far. I mean it's a stupid camera anyway — although the touch screen worked, kind-of — it's a Nikon; it's proprietary rechargeable, and no viewfinder. I mean, the beautiful Pro90's rechargeable, but I got it from an Ebay guy what supposedly takes returns. ... And my Nikon D80 was from Amazon! ... Not a silly junk store. ... Enticing as they are, perhaps I should've been more cautious in the storied aisles o' junk. ... It's not even worth saving the charger/batteries, although of course I will — the whole point of the scam is its uniquity, i.e. the batteries are designed to fit no other camera.... Obiter Dictum: the FailureThe magical search for silly cameras has hit a stretch of rough road, and who knows if I'll ever find the highway again. Two previously-amusing vendors, Cooper City and Oviedo, sold me broken junk which, to be sure, were entirely my fault — I mean, they are junk stores, and the Cooper City qv3000 was obviously broken, and I only paid $20. The s4000 was just a classic good-$-after-bad geezer delusion. ... And so be it! ... If I must stumble, I will stumble in search of the good and the right and the silly. ... So I bought another s4000 for $20 @ ebay, which'll probably also be totally gershtunk....
|
No! ... It was an eviiil 4Gb CF card which I have scrawled with red marks of warning, to forestall future tragedies. Four gig was too much anyway — actually, I realized that with my antiquated tastes, I should only stock the two gigabyte old-FAT flavor — the bigger ones were for latter-day rip-off DSLRs, even unto the current era or at least a few years ago. ... Anyway, the camera works much better with a good old-fashioned 2Gb CF; turns off & on without terror, buttons work, everything! ... Well, a lot of things — I don't want to go crazy here — the pictures are still, as always in the Age of Macintosh, too dark. And I can't do the ridiculous 100 "scenes" I could've loaded from the casio CD included in the $700 retail, to my eternal despair. ... But it definitely works better than its pitiful inspiration, the qv3000....
|
It takes charming pictures, some of them strangely dark — i.e. more than usual — but I assume the flash capacitor's still forming-up in there and it shows signs of encouraging improvement. I took the first tests with the internal memory which will only be recovered with Kodak proprietary "EZ share" scammery — i.e. it is locked-away like the tombs of the pharohs — but a nice SD card got some working images. The flash doesn't seem to go off until I tried a few times; I have to be more adroit with the DEL button.... But these are mere peccadilloes, and make me feel better about wasting my money on my broken A540 a year after this lovely device's advent. And the pix are nice, at least excluding the broken-flash ones.... Pre-broken Automatic FlashAnd then ol' dpreview came to the rescue yet again. I googled "p850 flash" and found this, where someone explained that he had to physically "nudge" the flash back to make it work! Which did, and I guessed it's a contact thing so I tried deoxiting the adorable little machine — but that did no good. But it does flash, reliably, with the nudge.... When I wiggle the stupid thing, it's obvious: physically it doesn't spring backwards enough. That is, I can start taking a pic that needs flash and the thing will "automatically" pop up, but I can feel how it'll obviously go further back, or for that matter, once I nudge it into the working position — where it willingly stays — and it takes a good flash picture, I can easily nudge it a little forward to the non-working position, where it'll rest there and I can take bad flash pix! ... I.e., cheap junk spring. ... But let's say, an artisanal automatic camera, requiring knowledgeable user intervention? ... Because of the camera's subtlety? ... So? ... It's a Kodak! |
And it doesn't work. It was $15 at ebay, and I suppose it's not worth returning so I'll just try & repair it to destruction — a sadly common practice here at the laboratory. ... Its SD card socket is sick; the SD doesn't stick in "good" and doesn't pop-out right, and the software complains the card is gershtunk. ... Actually, until my repair, it could probably take internal pix but of course no mortal will ever know without adequate ez$scam equipment. After the repair, which involved essentially submerging it in deoxit, it is sadly gershtunk forever or at least until the deoxit dries out and/or we are reborn in a better world. ... So I bought another @ ebay — only $14! ... I'm sure it'll work out well.... 12/30/18.
And it did! And I learned that, shamefully, I unncessarily
repaired my original CD33 to extinction and wasted
$15! ... Truly, the first CD33's SD
socket
was physically
gershtunk — which must be my inadequate excuse — but apparently
the
camera's software couldn't stand the vast open spaces of 2 gigabytes,
and my $14 So I grovel in repentant shame for my pitiful tiny silly camera abuse. ... Forgive me, tiny silly camera, for sending you into oblivion before your time. ... It does have an optical viewfinder, but no way to turn-off the LCD, so it'll probably run out of batteries before I can take my 20 remaining pix. Of course I can always upgrade to a 256Mb card. ... Actually it was able to deal with a 512Mb card nicely — and now I'll definitely run out of batteries before I take 452 pictures. And there is an LCD off button; but it doesn't persist through power cycles.... |
So the amazon/vendor will take it back, but I gotta pay shipping! So the moral is: don't pay so much for a used camera, and maybe check-out ebay. ... And I must aver the S2000 is a wretched shadow of the 2008 canons — the Canon S10 for instance, which of course I also bought at amazon for vast sums but also of course that was OK 'cause it's a Canon. I suppose the S2000 was the cheapo competition and, aside from vignetting, it was real slow compared to any canon. And then I had to pay $18.02 @ the UPS store to return the stupid thing (to a "Louis Anderson"), via snail mail. Of course I could've got it cheaper if I'd repackaged it and waited 17 hours in the post office line. ... And the way it's gone so far, I'll probably have to dispute the charge. ... I would have to say that Amazon is no longer, if it ever was, the right place to buy broken used cameras.... Ebay Rescue?But hold it a minute, here's a $40 free-shipping S2000 @ ebay! Certainly I will have to get it — right price, and the vendor is obviously less confused than my amazon merchant. ... So the adventure continues! Rescue Faulty: Camera Broken in a Different Way, but No Comments, No Rating Allowed!1/28/19. The ebay fellow was better — certainly, the undisclosed totally-broken LCD display was a disappointment, but since I rarely use the things, and the preferred EVF seems to work fine, I might not bother with the annoyance of returning the thing. Takes good pictures! Although the LCD is occasionally useful, if I was actually using these silly cameras for anything, for reviewing one's pix.... And I note that both amazon and ebay have taken to hiding their used vendors' IDs. Which, if they sell a lot of stuff with undisclosed defects is perfectly understandable. However my ebay account reveals all — well, a terse "schicjar" is the only ID, and he's a "power seller" so I can't leave a negative rating until 7 days have passed. ... Maybe I will return the thing.
... I don't know if I and the Fujifilm S2000HD will meet again, but so far, my opinion of Fujifilm has not been enhanced. ... But paypal claims the ebay vendor's refund happened — before the still-pending amazon nonsense — so I guess I'm content.... Nasty Habit?And, in the slow turning of the years, I realized I had another vignetting Fuji.... |
So I've ordered scads of the scam-of-the-week (2007 vintage) Memory Stick Duo Pro, and the first one should turn-up in a few days, still leaving me time to find-out the stupid camera is actually broken, and return it to the ebay "free return" vendor. ... And oh look it says on the bottom "Memory Stick Pro Duo"....
2/3/19. So my Duo Pro film came and I took a picture! A little shaky but perhaps it's still settling down. ... But the silly camera works! And the stupid USB cable came, and it worked — 'though I had to turn the camera on. ... So my beautiful scammy Sony DSC-H7 is perfect and ready for foto fan fanatic fun! ... Well my 2nd pic still look a little shaky, but that is well within the range of scammy foto fun. But it has Sony Super SteadyShot® image stabilization! ... But still no foto fun. Finally I turned-off the tulip-in-the-viewfinder macro mode, but that seemed to make it worse. Then I looked at the lens and, seeing it covered with smeary stuff, cleaned it with official fotofan lens cleaning junk and — voila! — is it perfeto! ... Sadly it's too stupid to remember I wanted the EVF instead of the battery-draining live view LCD, and when I took a picture what included some daylit windows, there were purple strips in the EVF — but so what! ... It is the way of the silly camera.... But actually there's plenty of foto fun left — figuring-out the menagerie of graphic symbols on the screens is bound to be a treat. I mean everybody knows the Tulip means you got the thing set to macro mode by accident. But what does the yellow triangle with "0EV" caption signify? Sillly camerists want to know. ... Oh! It mean zero Exposure Value, which cannot be set with any prodedure described in the manual, although in auto mode, up/down arrows seem to do it. ... But being Sony, the manual has a complicated relationship with the product — "bogus" is probably the term I'm reaching for — not helped to be sure by apparently being for at least two cameras, my innocent suspect and the gloriously superior no-doubt H9. ... Ad astra u know.... |
That's what I found almost immediately after opening the amazon vendor "rockymountainbrown" box, for which I paid an exorbitant $23.99. ... Dpreview claims it's $295 @ amazon, and google provides a cornucopia of presumably-bogus prices topping-out @ newegg.com with $346.30! So I got a tremendous bargain. ... And I must note that my bogus proprietary Sony Pro Duo memory stick was in itself a wondrous achievement: somehow accidentally I bought stuff that was actually a µSD card with two "carriers", one of them of the Sony Scam Pro Duo flavor — and it worked wonderfully! It wasn't actually real cheap, but I feel so proud of somehow denting the fraud.
Then I wrapped things up with a camera-strap-ectomy 'tween the H7 & the H2, so the latter'd get the glory of the genuine Sony strap ... which actually seems to fit/work better on the H2. The Sadness: H2 Shutter Focus DefectBut then, I was stricken! The H2's sacred half-way
shutter
doesn't. However gently I press it, no jumping green
rectangles or whirring or any sign of camera
focusing, until
I press down & click
the button
and
the picture gets taken — after
a focusing delay. My precious
bargain antique H2
is broken. As are, apparently, most of the Sony H1s, H2s,
and H5s. ...
|
... But in the day this adorable little gadget was $599 retail! ... I delusionally cherish these obviously bogus numbers, but people probably paid — well it turns-out $300 or so. And I got it cheap! With a printed manual! |
... And it was only $350 in the day; or less. ... I don't know why the a20 was so expensive. |
Just another point 'n' shoot Canon with its advertising sticker — shamefully proclaiming "7.5x zoom optical & digital combined" — without such fraud, it is a pedestrian 3x. ... But it takes OK pix. 'Twas $349 retail in the day. ... I suppose I could get an A30 now ... well, probably not. It was the cheapo 1mp alternative, and I'd assume the retail prices collapsed so fast in those stirring times that it missed its window i.e. compared to the luxurious 2mp A40; at least it seems to be without web offerings.... Can it be my pursuit of the wily silly camera is losing steam?!?!? ... Am I sated? Is the endless adventure dribbling-away? ... Tune-in next week. Or see SILLY V.... |