The Paint Programs & Their Regrettable Tendencies (as they were some years ago)Perspectives
& Adobe
elements 15 edit
photoshop!
lightroom!
eternal
slavery!
the
beautiful toys
VersionitisFirst of all (clearing his aged throat) I’d note that many people get a new paint program in honor of a new fancy camera in which they hope will be displayed its astonishingly-detailed images in beauty and glory and, of course, they’ll be able to tart them up ever further:
There are two really unrelated aspects of paint programming:
I use paint programs — never photoshop of course — mostly for two “photoshopping” modifications:
So the following sprightly text records my very-own scurrilous opinions of various Adobe and Corel & other paint programs, most now receding into the past as the scurrying years and versions and extortionate planned obsolescence stumble into the dirty gray fitful future.... Adobe
Elements
(Version 15) SUX
Adobe Elements 15 was But if you, like me, prefer cheap junk and not having your computer function as an adobe advertising kiosk, you could buy PSPX, or even maybe a cheapo old elements — elements is the kiddie-wheels photoshop anyway; does it really matter which version of the kiddie wheels you get? Particularly when there are so many useful free paint programs and of course the strange & beautiful free rawtherapee for those sensitive and utterly crucial raw effects. And if you have a Canon/Nikon DSLR with raw, you can probably get a free program from the manufacturer which can deal with its raw images, at least I could. .... Despite unending irritation, I did enjoy my journey through Adobe flake and flaming menace, because in the process I’ve unraveled various mysteries which puzzled me when I saw through the (competitive scammery) glass darkly. ... But in the end, Adobe annoyed me so much I uninstalled Elements 15 and blew my $40 like a man, or at least a hysterical geezer, and I consider the money well-spent on malware education. ... Since the entire hobbyist photography thing is largely a scam — particularly the magical DSLR flavor, but all the silly ridiculously-expen$ive cameras, the pictures taken with which cannot be distinguished — except by a $pecialist — from the much cheaper ≤2012 (used) flavor, which I enthusiastically favor — my only pleasure in Elements 15 — and photoshop for that matter — is a priceless quantity of exhilarating scorn & ridicule. ... Which I suppose I’ve cashed-out already, as I hurl my impotent contempt at them here.... License Extortion
But
the solution was so EZ!
... All I had to do was uninstall
my Elements version 10! Official Adobe: Standard Modern Mendacity I actually tried asking Adobe, and despite the obvious previous history an official adobe rep knew nothing of mysterious license extortions — but this is the standard modern mendacity; all these companies know everything about their incompetent failures and it is one of the duties of the personnel to pretend otherwise, so it’ll always be a surprise. ... Disappointingly, the rep didn’t produce the “well I’ve never heard of that before” excuse, which I guess has gotten too well-known as a legendary mediocrity justification. ... But no; Official Adobe says “sometimes the licensing between different versions gets whacked. It’s not common, but does occasionally happen.” And observe my children: Official Adobe Officially Implies there are other reasons the licensing “gets whacked”. ... Cheers us up, doesn’t it?
... After “fixing” my elements
15 by
uninstalling
elements 10, Pop-up Advertising!Just in case there was any doubt about Adobe shoddiness, I got a pop-up ad! Just like the pop-up virii you get from a dubious internet site, you lucky customer! ... And like typical annoyanceware/malware, there was no “X” or “close” button, just an ominous “Later”, because surely you’ll want to buy whatever c--p Adobe’s flogging, if they pester you enough? ... But the pop-up did close with Elements 15, the obvious moral being: don’t run elements, and before that, don’t buy it.... Icky-Poo Image ManagementThe
Lightroom/Elements
Organizer
approach
to image file management
/ libraries / catalogs
whatever
they’re called is a lot like whatever picture junk Apple is flogging
this week, the prime objective of which is, apparently, to hide
any knowledge of where the things actually are
in your hard drive’s directory structure,
because the poor wittle user
cain’t
stand the terror. ...
|
|
|
|
|
Alien Skin Exposure X4.5 $120Wondrous no doubt, but I started-off by not receiving my demo download link. ... Not encouraging. So I tried again, which worked. Touchy. ... But it’s downloading! ... Well it gets points for showing the pictures in a command-line directory argument. On Windows 7! ... ’N’ all-in-all, this is the most functional of my random sampling of photo programs in the last few years. ... Well it’s real slow to start the next morning morning — oh that was just the hidden “continue trial” box. So it started-up just where I was yesterday! It doesn’t see my pitiful Kodak “KDC” raw files — rawtherapee and pspx both do — but otherwise seems to do good. ...
Let’s try it with my giant pix directory. ... It tried to install
the
program; must’ve clicked the wrong button in the “continue
trial”
box. ... But now it’s going good,
and it’s doing the selective display; I can go to the end and it’ll
skitter over the intervening pix and start doing the ones at the end. Oh Gee! I just realized it’s showing me subdirectories? ... There’s a little icon next to the “Folders” caption on the upper left which, when hovered-over, says “Toggle Include Subfolders”, and that’s what it does. Which makes the program’s performance in my 4000-pix directory even better — although I’m not absolutely sure it got everything in the subdirectories, and I’m not going to bother counting; there doesn’t seem to be a count in the X4 display.... ... Here’s dpreview’s opinion of the program. Dubious Conclusion: OK ... but ...Of the various dubious softwares I’ve tried in my delusional role as paint program inspector, Exposure seems the most functional. ... Photoshop’s eternal slavery policy is a serious defect, even if you ignore the ridiculous expen$e. And I suppose affinity worked, kind-of. ... And, OK, Capture One was functional. And of course there’s DxO. ... But since I regard the raw cult as an amiable-or-not scam at best, Exposure doesn’t appeal, and even if I countenance the ridiculous raw, my antique PSPX does that for my antique cameras, as well as the up-to-date free rawtherapee for everything more-or-less. ... But if you and your beautiful new camera are obsessed with rawness, Exposure is obviously superior to many other contenders. ... But really, xnview still browses better.... Wandering Directories?Well I just noticed it created “... \AdobeTests\Alien Skin\Exposure X4\” which I suppose is OK. Other programs save raw info into files in the same directory as the raw (i.e. IMG_3972.cr2.pp3) which I prefer — but I see the lovely & gracious lightroom engages in comparable behavior. I have to use cacls when I want to back-up the Exposure files from another machine in my ridiculous network, but that’s probably true of lightroom too.... |
(Serif) Affinity Photo 1.6.5.135I downloaded a 10-day demo, and it’s not nearly as bad as my antique scurilous opinions. ... But it’s not so great:
But it doesn’t seem to be hammering the internet! — I’m astounded. ... I know, I’ll install it on my win10 system so I can get rid of this awful æro theme on my beloved antique Win7 system. ... Worked great. And I found the save-as. But I think it’s fair to say ol’ Affinity Photo is not ready for Windows 7. If anything — all things considered, even ’though it was a cheap $50, you’d be better off getting a cheaper old version of PSPX9 — $30! today 2/2/19 at amazon! — or of course one of the many free offerings. ... Hey it doesn’t even have a blown highlights detector! Jeesh. ... And then, wandering in the weeds, I discovered I’d bought the $50 “Affinity Designer” @ 2/15 for the mac — presumably my pitiful mini, what was still working in those halcyon days. But affinity still didn’t bond to me I guess. I suppose I could try rustling it up at the app store for my remaining macbookpro. ... But it was right there already — maybe that’s what I bought it for! All updated & everything. & apparently even more useless than today’s demo, but the poor macbook is so hard to use it’s hard to tell.... 2/5/20, affinity 1.7.3.481: Once again I
downloaded, after
some guy claimed it was a good photoshop
replacement,
but it still won’t run in win7 without aero. ...
But then I recalled, as part of the continuing owenlabs
falling-over-computers program, that I had a windows 10 desktop system
to replace
my cherished win7 “art”
PC,
for when it finally falls-over for the last time, which seems imminent,
and affinity installed there great! ... But still, the affinity
“.afphoto” extension is not visible to xn
or rawtherapy
or any of the
bunch, and particuarly since affinity is without a browser, this still
seems terminally unfortunate. ... After installing
affinity, win10 file explorer “sees” afphoto pictures, so if
you’re content using file explorer to wander about your hard drive,
double-clicking on an afphoto pic will start-up the glorious affinity
with the picture. And it is
only
$50. ... But of course rawtherapy
is free. ... And the .afphoto files are immense
— bigger than all the other raw files, although I suppose that’s
just bragging rights these days.... |
Darktable NOT RECOMMENDEDWell around 4/22/20, it created around 5,000,000 .xmp files in a picture directory, apparently because it felt like it. Googling darktable xmp suggests it’s documented behavior! ... And that’s the glory of the holy FOSS. ... You understand, it’s OK if it creates extra files when one enters the edit state. It shouldn’t do it just for browsing; kind of thing usux™’d do. ... One could probably figure-out how to avoid it even browsing and use the beautiful XNVIEW instead; our aquaintance was too brief to know for sure... |
Vuescan: RecommendedActually I can’t be absolutely sure, because it’s too much trouble for me to reinstall the kiddie-wheels version because of the copy-extortion the fellow is obliged to engage-in, but I’m pretty sure for $39.95 it’ll make your old scanner scan again after a usux® upf--k or whatever — the “built-in” windows 10 scanner is obviously gershtunk this week.... Vuescan was particularly talented at resuscitating my adorable antique paintshop pros — I don’t even have to use his perfectly adequate program, but can scan the usual way from within my beloved paint programs, where after vuescan installation, his TWAIN driver appears as a choice in the psp program’s “select TWAIN source” menu, and works good. ... Well actually it’s kind of cranky (@ 10/20), depending on what win10 upf--k has occurred recently ... works sometimes.... So the $80 “pro” version’ll deal with “Digital ICE” like my beloved V500, but so far Epson has kept its own drivers updated, which are probably better — but it’s nice to have the backup/choice. And he claims you can install on four PCs which might be enough for me anyway.... |
I’ve been a lifelong Paint Shop Pro fan — well,
since the 1992
psp
shareware version 1! — and I’ve bought
a few cheapo older versions of PSPX @ amazon — “PSPX”
being the
latter-day
Corel-degraded ridiculously dubiously-enhanced series, initiated when
Corel
bought the “Jasc” product in the time of the 2004 psp9.
... But
then
I foolishly
broke
with
tradition and bought PSP X8 Hyper Ultimate for $60 while it was still
new,
and although it
hasn’t
wrecked all
the
permissions on my hard drive
yet, it still seems to follow the proud Corel tradition of being
noticeably
inferior
to previous versions — PSPX6 for instance, doesn’t
seem to have the beautiful annoyanceware startup window, nor does it
pause for 30’’ every now and
then to run
the desktop’s
fan
furiously
while the program freezes. ... PSPX6’s “raw lab” just
starts-up,
almost like it was Corel Aftershot 2
(which came with pspx8 and also
mysteriously
avoids monstrous delays; but despises
my Kodak raw files).
... And to be sure,
PSP X has been known to run the occasional advertisement, ’jes
like the wicked Adobe — although
it seems my
beloved firewall
inhibits that process — an option forbidden
with compulsory-internet Adobe products. ... So
compassionately
I won’t
deride the pitiful
Paint Shop Pro X series even ’though it undoubtedly
deserves it, but I do
suggest
that one of the ~$30(?) “previous version”
PSPX cheapo deals @ amazon would be far
superior to the annoying Elements
(or of course the extravagant
lifetime slavery Photoshop
).
... @ 9/15/19, a PSPX9 CD was @ amazon for $24.90 — only 10 left! ... And in latter days I’ve adjusted to pspx9, and I just — after installing it on my tiny laptop in the frozen north — discovered there’s a check box on the “register on the internet you fool” that says something like “don’t bother me if I’m not connected” and I checked it! Oh joy, oh beauty...
I see in my enthusiasm for PSPX9 I have not properly emphasized the firewall — that you probably have to have to get to utilize the program without tears. At least I never use it without my firewall, although I vaguely recall in the misty past a few “naked” weeks and a deluge of virus-like advertising. Conclusion: my beloved pspx9 and subsequent releases no doubt WILL NOT RUN WITHOUT RELENTLESS PESTERING if you don’t get a wonderful firewall.
... Sadly that kind of thing has become the norm for modern software, and is probably why there is very little modern software, most of the products ascending to the bit-bucket of the internet. Except of course, for the genuinely FOSS offerings et al, many of which — but hardly all — are OK. LibreOffice for instance is an excellent replacement for whatever usux’s flogging this week. ... There are FOSS paint programs, none of which I’ve found inspiring. ... Although actually in latter days LibreOffice’s been running self-serving ads in the “lets all work together kids!” vein meaning “give us money you creepy sneek”. And I do give mozilla money, although I hate to donate to the democrat party....
The cheap previous-version strategy for PSPX seems to be particularly optimal since, in the little data I’ve gathered from Amazon reviews, the newest versions of PSPX produce the most advertising. But then again, they don’t produce any on my crates, at least for years, probably in part because I firewall them to helplessness. But this is all still a good reason to get the cheap previous version — at ebay maybe?
When I click PSPX8’s “Manage” tab, and then the “Computer” tab, I can see my disk drives with the usual rotating arrows and view my directory trees — well, at least after I’d started the program a few times — which works OK for wandering through directories with pictures in them. Select a picture and click the “Adjust” tab or the exciting “Edit” tab to perform picture-mutilation activities. This is easily as good as the pathological Adobe competition.
But for a few years, I just figured the alternate “Collections” tab (i.e. instead of “Computer”) was just there to be annoying. But no! What I couldn’t do without it was beat PSPX into submission with my fabulous batch files and command-line arguments &/or registry necromancy into starting in a desired directory, i.e. after wandering there in my beloved OwenShow or XN or something — until I finally realized that I just had to use the “Navigation” “Collections” tab instead of the “Computer” tab. Whereupon when I gave a command-line argument with a directory name — “c:\tempjgo\MyPix\AdobeTests\” say — the silly thing will happily display that directory; or, alternately, open the file specified on the command-line for edit. This makes PSPX much more useful....
It just took me 10 minutes to find its setting, so it’s files / preferences / file format preferences / general tab / “Open Raw images...” and you can check/uncheck if raw pictures should be opened in “raw lab”. Sometimes this is faster, sometimes slower, according to the ol’ reliable moon phase and random conniptions, but in general if one is going to waste one’s precious time with the no-doubt admirable raw cult, probably using the raw lab is the right choice.
As far as I can google; it’s entirely possible there’s some secret setting somewhere out there, what I’ve apparently forgotten or it doesn’t exist. ... This is a “feature” where date-sorted thumbnails are automatically grouped into horizontal panels, taking-up far more space than, for instance, sorting them by name. Autogroup has two styles: (1.) group by date, and (2.) group by date/time, the time adjustable by clicking the autogroup button and adjusting a slider from 0.1’’ (apparently ignored) to 60’’ where the time groups are shown by little orange triangles within the date-horizontal panels. ... The simplest workaround is to skip the entire Corel navigation pane & use the free XN, suitably jiggered so one can run PSPX from an alt key. Which seems to work OK when I leave PSPX running, so it doesn’t take its usuall 2 minutes to start. ... Of course, that’s why I don’t use it that much, sticking to PSP9 and the beloved PSP5....
I just tried out my little assortment of PSPXs, version 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9, and they’re quite similar functionally until back at version 3 the manage/adjust/edit tabs disappear. So, bearing in mind my senile ruminations about the latest cameras above, if you can get a cheap old one, why not?
So I actually started using PSPX9 more often starting in 2022 — until then I confined my delusions to psp8/9 which worked good, although psp5 is still easier to use than any of ’em. But pspx9 has a pretty good spot remover! — once I found the thing. ... Sadly ’though, pspx9 also shows signs of typical corel rot, at least the perspective thingey failed utterly on one occasion. But, like the better kind of contemporary sofware, it often works....
PSPX9 tip/trick: set the default workspace to “edit” and then starting the thing without an argument’ll go there — which I’ve been doing frequently to paste-in beautiful internet postcards I’ve stolen from ebay so I can remove spots in pspx9. ... Although maybe I had to give it a non-existent file — I used a hyphen “-”. I mean it’s squirrely in my endless batch files.
... I should note that the the 1-step enhance photo thingey in pspx9 stinks; psp8/9 are much better, where the feature color-corrects, makes the image brighter/darker; in pspx it just seems to make it brighter, and the brightness/contrast is almost always a better choice. But then I discovered the “Smart Photo Fix”, just under the 1-step thingey in the PSPX9 “Adjust” menu, does the job as well as psp9 and probably even better, ’cause it’s adjustable.
& of course I can just use both: treat the pic in psp8/9 with the 1-step, and then copy it to pspx for spot/line removal. Which latter incidentally works pretty good; I have to adjust the line (“scratch”) removal thing to smaller and be real careful, but I managed to remove an obvious line from a lovely color postcard. The object/scratch removers hang-out with the clone brush because they are automated forms of cloning, the basic idea being to steal bits of the surrouding image to obliterate the offensive intrusion. ... And the next day I removed two scratches easy-peasey! Gets easier with practice. ... Sadly, like all these software image gadgets, it won’t do miracles; marks over text, for instance, are real hard to remove no matter what.
If you insist on Elements anyway foolish fotofan, as it is said of old, beware of the man with one paint program — two are always better, & etc. ... And I should note that one of PSPX8’s endearing talents not shared with its previous versions was the ability to install the vast “Nik” filter collection — no longer free at last (?), sadly. ... But which, apparently, wasn’t the case with elements 15, although maybe with elements 12?
But anyway, bankrupt DxO bought NIK, and has a new ver$ion, but this fellow claimed you can jump through hoops and maybe get the free thing — but sadly he just links to a DXO gimmick to get you to use the new pay-for version, so sad — and you have to agree to “replace” — aka “destroy” — any existing version of the NIK collection. ... But this seems more likely — nope, sorry, it’s just another DxO scam. ... So too bad for you guys; I got my free NIK filter package somewhere in my acres of hard drives....
... Well wait, let’s try this guy who claims to have a link to the old free software, which link goes to here. ... And we have a winner! Or so it seems; see how to install it into pspx9.
... And be sure to never buy ANYTHING from the fraudsters at DxO; I know I will try to avoid them. ... But really, folks, these wonderful filters aren’t so wonderful....
.... And I want to point out an unintentional reveal of the DXO NIK scammery, which is that the free NIK is apparently so indistinguishable from the DxO ver$sion, that they have to make every effort to destroy the free NIK....
The scum who support the Nik filters these days — i.e. the loving caring camera/graphics community — are so enthusiastic, the scumbags have made any information about the filers secret! ... Dont google it! You wont find it, neither with bing or duck-duck-go. Its like Niks republican! ... So you gotta explore the Nik filters by youself, in your obsolete paint program where youve installed the sadly antique but still-works-in-PaintShopPro, you sad cheapo so-OK with the in-crowd cute kids extorionate graphics/camera crowd....
And
then in the fullness of time as I tried to approximate the beloved dark
lowering skies of the fervent fotofan I suddenly, in a flash of
inspiration,
guessed
there’d
be a Nik
neutral density filter, and so there was! Confirmed by google. ... So I
spelunked in, and there it was in PSPX9
@ “Effects / plugins / Nik collection / Color Efex Pro 4 / Graduated
Neutral Density”. And it was good. And explains why the once super-hot
lowering skies topic has so faded off the puffery radar,
and
why it’s stupid
to buy any
camera filter — unless of course you wish to get the nauseating “gooey
water” effect....
One of the numerous benefits of the free Nik collection — to me at least — was demonstrating just how stupid these things are. They’re marginally amusing free; but paying to make your photos look like old film or even old black & white film seems excessive. I mean, doing these things still takes time and effort, and on top of that, to have to pay for the filter — gasp! ... The odd effect, like my neutral density appreciation, is sort-of nice. But only sort-of. ... I’ve taken a fair number of useless images — ~6Gb of ~2,500-or-so pictures since 2016 and the advent of my gloriously silly camera obsession — and tragically I’ve only used the ND effect once. ... Although it’s so stupid-cute I’ll probably use it again — especially since I’ll be using pspx9 forever it seems....
And then in the remote places of my “arts” crate — actually it was installed with my cheapo PSP X8 — I found a copy of on1 Perfect Effects 9.5 which, also, was amusing. But less so when I discovered it was copy-extorted to only install into PXP X8, of course. ... Until I realized I could just include it into my vast PaintMenu.bat which I’ve installed into the beautiful & cranky XN and voila! hot & cold weird silly effects on demand. ... So I guess the moral of the story is “free” effects good, “pay” bad; which is the conclusion of many of my stories....
The glorious web has at least a few really lame descriptions of how to install the free Nik filter package into PSPX9, often involving dragging/dropping entire directories, which is generally a bad idea (altho possibly it’d work if PSPX interprets it as a directory name which it probably does). ... So out of boundless charity, and because I’d like to remember myself as I beat another laptop into submission ...
et voila it is done. & it should show-up @ effects/plug-ins/Nik Collection, God wot. ... And it probably wont install in newer programs because of their deep compassionate BS BS. Another good reason for searching-out pspx9 on Ebay ... where used PSPX9s can be quite reasonable, and may even work. ... Of course I abuse it with my firewall....
In my endless pursuit of knowledge and pain, I tried the “2020” version 30-day demo, and I can report it is only significantly worse than PSPX9. This is normal ... all the PSPs are worse than their predecessors in one way or another. PSP2020 did insist I register — give them an email address — but I turned off its internet connections, and while it tries after every invocation, it still runs without it. ... And it didn’t let me paste-in the email address, suggesting they’ve lost heart all ready, and indeed I could give it “CantPaste@CantPaste.com” and it was perfectly happy.
Win some, lose some! Another day and psp2020 started-up in full screen — because wittle bittle photographerittl’ll find it easier that way — and omitted the preview on the lower left (in the collections view), replacing it with a floating window, which I closed and couldn’t get back. On the other hand, while flailing-around, I tried the big arrow on the bottom right of the thumbnail window, and found a “thumbnail info” which, when checked, puts captions on the pictures! How insanely clever. ... Restarting it kept the thumbnail captions, but didn’t restore the old preview pane. But it seems to be a bottom-tabbed navigation/preview pane now ... and maybe it was before. Who can tell? ... Well it does seem to start — frequently, but not always — in full screen mode, so you innocents will be protected from hideous harm....
Sat 2/8/20. I downloaded it again, this time to my emergency back-up “art” win10 machine (as the current win7 office-holder falls slowly over), and learned that the edit screen is optimized for touch, be still my heart. ... Featureitis already abandoned by Usux™, when they cast their beloved windows phone to the waves. ... So it’s all over ... Corel picked the wrong horse, presumably will never recover, and I will cherish my pspx9 until the end of time....
They always seem in a contest to get to bankruptcy fastest. But it was all as the previous version, even to my entering the CantPaste@CantPaste.com! ... Perhaps I’ll remember to uninstall it sooner....
And now my attentive & wildly enthusiastic
audience, let us
venture into the
golden age of Paint Shop Pro. ... I
have
a particular fondness for the 1998
version 5, but that’s
no doubt the usual mind-share
/ stubborn-geezer
problem,
and so around 10/16 I’ve been toying with a radical upgrade to
the 8/04 PSP 9! Which of course I got in the archives, because I got all
the updates
until the dreaded “X” days of Corel — and many of those,
too. Although PSP5 still
impresses
with its superior speediness,
compared to the stodgy version 9, although the
latter browses
much faster, at least with numerous images.
And indeed in recent months (11/18) I’ve reverted to the beloved version 5 for many hum-drum tasks; it has all the important features of the later PSPs — except auto-fix, and the perspective feature, and the browsing stinks, but I use XN anyway — and PSP5 is ridiculously faster. You who might wish to indulge in the legendary antique experience could try this fellow who seems to have various dubious free copies of old PaintShop Pros, and the 5.01 version I downloaded @ 5/26/16 seemed unmalwaresque. But it could be a sneaky 30-day trial or something — but at 9/2/19 it’s still going although of course your mileage etc. ... He’s got versions up to 12.something, but everything above 11.20 was AWOL. And 11.20 turned-out to be a trial of X1, requiring internet registration. ... Likewise his PSP9 is the copy-extorted Corel version which requires internet groveling with your bank routing number (also the 102Mb version 10 I tried). ... And naturally there are totally-unrelated free paint programs....
Anyway for those who have trod my path, perhaps — all
three of
you? — the
non-x ancien
PSP8 and 9, at least,
have a peculiarly brilliant
defect: you
can’t
change printers — i.e. from your bizness b&w
default laser to the cheap-as-dirt color job — at least I couldn’t
on
super-modern OSs
like Vista and
all the brilliant usux™ successors. Which
used to stop me in my tracks
— along, to be sure, with
numerous other ingenious
pointless changes
just
to make it impossible for someone used to the old
program — particularly
the
text tool, which seems to be devoted
to producing invisible text. I thought all I had to do was reverse
the “materials” pallet there, but one glad morning that didn’t
work
and my text was still
invisible so who knows.
“Create as selection” will
definitely
be
invisible. ... Perhaps I will break down some day and read a book.
... And Behold! The “Dummies” book told me to uncheck “All
tools” on
the materials palette, which at least keeps the text at the same
setting, after I managed to print non-invisible text by
some fluke. ... And then in the fullness of passing months, eventually
I find I can use psp9’s “floating” text just as if it
worked
the way it
used to! ... I must be confused somehow....
Anyway,
I
stole some Delphi
code from the
internet
and produced setdef.zip
which contains
setdef.exe and complete stolen delphi 7 source! It has no installation
program or anything; run it and you can change the default printer that
stupid
Paint Shop
Pro can’t. If you run it like “setdef /?”
it’ll
print an incomprehensible summary of numerous remarkable
options, which might be explained in the readme.txt. ... With the
trusty
setdef beside it, my beloved PSP9 has a sophisticated print dialog with
convenient resizing features & everything! ...
Of
course
your computer and your printer and all your precious photography will
explode
in a fiery catastastrophe from just downloading
setdef, so BE WARNED....
And I suppose if anyone should be foolish-enough to somehow use my beloved reliquary psp9 they should know it seems to have a difficult time with the lovely & gracious Windows 8 — as does practically everything, including my beautiful setdef. Particularly in the mornings, when what with the cold cold electrons win8’s so arthritic.
I should note that my astonishingly talented setdef is equivalent to leaving the “Devices and Printers” windows thing open, and setting various printers to default. Setdef is more convenient — smaller, and when it exits it might restore the default printer it found when it started. Sadly, it hangs-up/crashes more than Devices & Printers. Maybe....
PSP6 and seven I believe — psp8 too — start-up with a box or two complaining about how it can’t get to the registry and idiotically advising you to use the dangerous and frightening regedit, but not saying what on earth you’d do with it. You just have to click the psp boxes off, although some things like remembering directories probably won’t work unless you fix it. Which can be done by running psp as administrator once; it’s probably a very bad idea to run any graphics program, or any program for that matter, as admin all the time (although MaximumPC mag thinks everybody should, always!). I use the command-line elevate for this glorious purpose, which I just discovered is a .NET program when Microsoft insisted on downloading .NET for it on a new computer. ... Googling for it found a few dubious (?) alternatives....
The kosher
Windows GUI way
to do it is to right-click the program icon,
“properties”, “compatibility” tab, “privilege
level” box,
check “run this program as an administrator”, “OK”,
and then when you
run it it’ll ask the ominous security question and you’ll go
right
ahead. Immediately
exit
the program and uncheck
that box.
If you save an image in PSP9, and then try to save something else, it may give a bogus overwrite warning. I can reproduce the bug like
Although I suspect there’ll be other slight variations that’ll show-up when I least expect it. And if I dismiss the bogus warning, it definitely will overwrite any existing file that happens to have the specified name.
Two random psp9 updates did not cure it — but uninstalling the two PSP9 updates did! ... That is, it works better entirely unupdated. ... Perhaps something else horrible will bubble-up, but it hasn’t in a few months. ... Except of course hanging-up/crashing in win8, but then everything does that. ... Seemed to work marvelous (?) in Win10, with setdef of course....
Tragically,
PSP9 doesn’t work on a 12/17 Asus
Vivobook F510UA FHD laptop — nor, it turned-out, on an 8/15 Asus
F555L win10 system; nor for that matter on a recent acer, so it looks
like
a trend is developing — but psp8 will,
and once I found my favorite feature
hidden at “enhance photo / one step photo fix” my keening greif
is under control — & I suppose I’ll have to figure-out
PSPX9,
which still works great — well as much as it ever does — and
isn’t so slow on newer machines. Or just use the glorious fast ’n’
EZ psp5....
Eventually I broke down and googled “psp9 win10” and got a bunch of hits which pretty much said “doesn’t work with recent graphics drivers”. Probably because PSP was cute @ the ending, puffing itself up for the Big Sale with all kinds of fancy graphics, and it worked great on all the fancy computers they had around the shop @ 2004. ... I mean, all the older PSPs, from version 8 on back, work fine. ... Well, except for the other bugs....
But then again, while struggling with the Asus March to Mediocrity and beyond, I updated a display driver and behold! PSP9 lives again. On that laptop, the F510UA thing. ... And somewhere in the fog of update, a beautiful 9/18 Acer Aspire E15, seemingly doomed to the lesser PSP8, learned all on a bright morning on the road somewhere how to run PSP9! An unexpected blessing....
Many of my beloved PSPs keel over
trying to “browse”
files they can’t or shouldn’t;
a
particularly likely
failure is their jejune attempt to read Corel Draw “.CDR”
files,
which
over the years I’ve crushed by replacing the existing “cdr32.flt”
in
the PSP program directory somewhere with a zero-length rendition of the
same name.
...
Now if only I could figure-out how to force it to stop
taking-forever / crashing while reading PDF files, a talent the
beloved psp5 has naturally.
...
And gee, in a stirring upholding of tradition even pspx8
browses pdf directories real
slow.
... But Behold:
the antique PSP9 “file / preferences / general program
preferences / browser tab / file format exclusions button” lets
me
exclude
PDFs! Oh rapture.
... In my PSPXs it’s in the “manage”
something. ... But corporate skulduggery no doubt still
suppresses CDR
suppression, so I will continue with my cdr32.flt zeroizing
strategery. ... But I note that PSP8
is particularly virulent
in this fault, and seems to keel over @ CR2, PSD, DNG images — anything
with
a taint of raw, or who knows. ... Its successor PSP9 abandoned such
attempts although even it
gets
bogged-down in larger pdf-filled
directories
the
first time for a few minutes — apparently it takes a while to ignore
all those PDFs....
But Lo! PSP8 @ my latest cranky Asus Win10 laptop browses raw files with ease! ... At least 3 or four times. The same files what’ll reliably crash PSP8 on other less creative computers. And this is so good, as PSP9 is verboten there. Of course PSP8 crashes reliably if I foolishly try & open a raw file, but I am humbly grateful nevertheless. And it still fails on my other highly-superior recent Lenovo desktop Win10 system. ... That ol’ debil moon-phase agin’ mayhap....
So all the
beloved PSPs have numerous bugs. I’ve used PSP9 for a year or so
and
the
worst
so far — well aside from the spiteful asii
— is the can’t-change-printers thing which I knew of yore —
they
probably did something Usux™ told ’em to, but then Usux™
changed its mind — but
finally in my golden years I’ve crushed
it to my satisfaction with my glorious setdef
program. Which, to be sure, still has its own beloved crotchets. And
PSP9’s
cunning text obfuscation
and, at least on one of
the computer herd, inability to close itself in the morning — the
lovely
& gracious windows
8 perhaps (I’ve crafted a KILLPSP.BAT
file for that) although as the days go on, it’s been doing that less
— but it makes it all so interesting,
and the older PSP5, following tradition, still
works better....
... PSPX6-9 of course have no such difficulties; or at least in the limited time I’m willing to spend with the giant things I haven’t encountered anything beyond occasional ridiculously slow operations — always worse in later versions — which a naïve person might think were hangups. And they don’t insist on constant internet connection unlike the wondrous contemporary Adobe products, including the eternal-slavery photo$hop, which have no annoying bugs or ridiculously slow operations of course or obvious pitiful stupidities, other than the obviously-desirable malware advertising....
So I’m fond of my cranky 2004 PSP9 — and content-enough with the PSPXs. All of which are better than the Adobe products. ... So I finally bought a PSP book, what I’ve never done before! ... Used, of course, for $8 @ amazon, but there are the most amazing things in there — actually avoided, for fear of the dreaded terminal infuriation eruption. ... The PSP8 book had sloppy examples with missing steps, not unlike the camera books, although those favor non-existent buttons/features. ... So then I bought the superior dummies book for $17!
...
And just to show how I got no hard
feelings, I went and bought a
dummies book for Elements 10!
$7 used at amazon! ...
Thus I will be
up-to-date on all the latest golden-age-of-digital-phography trends and
pretensions. Although I must report it’s near the shoddy end of the
paint program
books — in the bin with the psp8 zero-to-hero thing! ... Shocking!
...
But ... color pictures! And the authors warn the
elements 10 pilgrim to
use & learn his directories,
good but ridiculous
advice considering the product’s misfeatures
and target dummies.
... This is one of those books — I’ve encountered a few in my tawdry career — which makes its subject less intelligible the more I read it. This is because it’s a stupid book obliged to promote a stupid product. Many of the intricate features it goes on about are the wonderful things you can do with the elements organizer database which will infallibly turn on you sooner or later (5 million google hits for “adobe elements broken catalog”). The features are supposed to make up for the stupid organizer breaking, so they’re splendiferous and extensive and intricate as all get out, lucky foto fans! ... One of the book’s major unnecessary challenges is pretending, along with Adobe and all the other software mediocrities of the universe, that a rag-bag of programs, in this case the useless organizer + the editor, are, in a kind of hermetic truth only perceived adequately by those of sufficient faith, one program ... so they keep referring to the “Full Editor” “workspace” or some such inherently-confusing term.
...
So I’m skimming. And as I wander into the nuts
& bolts, particularly the layers, it’s apparently the same as
the 2004 PSP9 with slight
differences —
presumably both derived from the ur-photoshop features along the weary
years, but with elements obviously crippled so as to enhance
the allure of photoshop.
... Then I realized I was harmlessly assuming ae10 and ae15 were
equivalent,
which
would be a terrible bad thing even ’though they undoubtedly are mostly,
but I bought yet another stupid book, the ae15 dummies
thing for $22 — a scandalous luxury expenditure. ... Already I noticed
in the amazon “read-inside” that they’ve
stopped
pretending the rag-bag is one program. Although the photo magazines
still engage in the “module” fairytale to avoid frightening
their
innocent fans.
On the other hand, my beloved PSPX9 has no book @ amazon except for the scammiest. Corel has paintshop-pro-x9.pdf somewhere on the web, and a beautiful site maybe. Of course PSPX9’s officially obsolete; I thought there were a few PSPX8 books but that was the excitingly meretricious CorelDRAW X8....
That would be the antique PSP9 “adjust / one step photo fix”. I laughed, I cried. ... Well sometimes it’s nuts, but then I just ^Z it away. It for instance recognizes if you’re trying to adjust a small image, and goes overboard on it, in an attempt I assume to make it legible/visible. ... But often, it’s right. With medium size and larger images from life, it seems to be infallible. ... I mean, I assume there’re 1-step fixits not known to me yet to astound & amaze, but I tried Irfanview’s for instance, and it wasn’t as reliable. ... & @ PSP8, “enhance photo / one step photo fix”.
... In the modérne-but-still-obsolete
PSPX9
it’s on the
“Edit” tab, “Adjust / One Step Photo Fix”.
... Not, of
course, on the PSPX9 “Adjust” tab where I was foolishly seeking
it. But compared to
good ol’ PSP9, it was weak, tired. ... But that’s because,
as
I eventually discovered, I
was supposed to use the PSPX9 “Smart Photo Fix...” which is
just
under “one step” and adustable,
and might even be better!
It’s easier. ... It’s
some
kind of rule of our mortal world, that things cannot
be improved
without being made
worse.
... I noticed it this morning
when I was trying to make a “white out” layer on an image,
where
I
could selectively put white squares where I wanted stuff shown faded —
by making the white-square layer 50%
transparent/opaque.
The
layer
part worked great. But along the weary way, PSP9 had decided that one
should always
make shapes
as objects
which, to make the
short story, screwed my scheme up the kazoo. Of course
there’d be a way to work around it, but why
oh why he
begged the empty ceiling,
must
it be so!?!?! ... And the
empty ceiling answered not. ... But I’m keeping my antique
paint shop pro 5 readily at hand....
And as the weary months tick on, PSP5 becomes more and more attractive. A few little features in PSP9 et al are better, including PSP9’s pic fix, but the rest of it’s just so EZ ’n’ fast in the 1998 PSP5. PSP5’s inability to show images at percentage resolutions — it’ll resize ’em any which way, but to do a quick smaller view, it only does whole numbers, i.e. 1/2, 1/4 etc. — I “solved” by enlisting the free Irfanview to show the image in whatever magnification/reduction I want; it updates with Shift+R, and the two screens are actually more convenient for my humble endeavors....
But sadly I must report that on at least one of my Win10 herd, the psp5 browser doesn’t work — exits abruptly. Took me a while to notice, since I always use XN anyway but still, a definite demerit. Psp6 did the same thing. But psp7 seems copacetic, so I will use it on that member of the swarm, and it will add interesting variation to my ridiculous menagerie. But sadly, there is no free “old” working version of psp7.04, only a 30-days evaluation. I of course have the original, but you poor peasants, if your win10 thing rejects psp5 browsing, will have to use the XN route.
But
my psp7, at least, still is able to select printers. The great divide
in
paint shop
pros comes with version 8, which implemented a python script system,
which was doubtless responsible for the wonderful fixit
feature and
the disappointing
slow-down. And probably the inability to select printers. But today’s
paint programs including Photoshop
probably all
use scripting, or at least they’re all extremely slow, and psp7 still
starts almost as fast as psp5, and actually browses
much
faster — I may just
settle down with it, abandoning my simple-hearted PSP5. ... And for
that
matter, even psp9 is monstrously
faster to get going than PSPX,
Photoshop,
or Photoshop Elements. ... And
it’s not as if
those newer
paint programs work all that good anyway. ... Although psp7 does
include some infuriating “improvements” a la psp9 ... maybe
I’ll
stick with my harmless browserless psp5 anyway....
— the seen-it-all done-it-all savant, 1/19
1.
Adobe Elements 15 is officially obsolete @ 10/17, and you can
now spend your photographic extortion dollars on “Elements 2018 (or
fill-in current year)”
($100? @ amazon 10/17). ... And
not to be outdone, my beloved not-quite-as-scammy
PaintShop Pro
has also evolved into a version “2018” (et all into the future
presumably), which I’m sure
will be
marvelously treat-laden and maybe even internet-addicted also; the reviews
at amazon are not inspiring. But I tried the
30-day demo,
which seemed as harmless as the X9 version.
They threw away the “adjust”
tab, which was
probably just supposed to imitate some lightroom tab anyway. ... The
amazon complainers about pop-up ads probably haven’t deployed my
various
autoruns
& firewall
prophylatics, for shame. ... But now’s
the time to buy the at-last-previous PSP
X9 for
~$40 @ amazon 4/18; and it’s only available from the dreaded “these
sellers”, so hurry.
... Anyway, in ancient days this page was filled with a diatribe disparaging the 2011 Adobe Elements 10. ... When elements and I first met, I mistakenly assumed its disorganizer was supposed to find all the images on my system — because it is designed to discard all directory organization, and I foolishly figured, why would they do that otherwise? .... But I was wrong. The elements disorganizer and Adobe lightroom and the Apple Photo thing-of-the-week — I’ve lost track — all operate in the same directory-obliterating way, presumably so the poor wittle user won’t be frightened or something, but at least the elements organizer isn’t supposed to find all your images. Or maybe it is, but it can’t: when I tried that in 2011, it ran for hours and hours and crashed — more than once, heaven help me. ... So you still have to tell it where they are, once; and then I guess you’re supposed to forget forever.
So I reinstalled Elements 10 on a derelict win7 crate @ 12/16, and the organizer seemed to work without whine, when informed of a few decorous image directories. It’s true there was a service or two installed which I swatted down, but it didn’t seem to make much difference — well, actually, trying to do “Files / Watch folders” in the version 10 organizer elicited a complaint about the service not being present, and that just made me feel good. But then I turned the apparently-harmless service back on; it’s still firewalled and cannot consort with its evil twisted mother Adobe. ... And I can’t type the path into the watch box! — gotta click-click-click; suggesting that nobody ever uses it; it’s just one of those things so the adobe reps can explain-away how come the squalid adobe bogus organizer products don’t do what other directory-oriented file browser do by default, which is automatically recognize new pictures in the directory you’re visiting. And that of course is because the apple/adobe icky-poo model is so superior....
Elements 10 is actually indistinguishable from version 15 and for that matter the photoshop/lightroom duo, except in each case, from elements 10 to 15 to photoshop/lightroom, there are more (mostly-undetectable) treats and more (very annoyingly-detectable) internet malware. I made my firewall entirely deny Elements 10 any quarter, and yet it still runs as well as ever, although still suggesting occasionally I should buy something more expensive. ... As noted in my endless lamentations above, this is not true of elements 15 or photoshop which require constant internet connection. ... More random bullet points follow....
On a 2nd elements 10 install, the organizer never really worked, although the editor worked as well as it ever does. ... And after all, the only people who ever use the organizer or lightroom are the totally impartial unbiased super-knowledgable photo experts in the puffy magazines and web sites. ... So along my weary way I found a bunch of old catalogs at “C:\ProgramData\Adobe\Elements Organizer\Catalogs\” and deleted them. ... And then, in my relentless pursuit of running junky software to its uttermost, I uninstalled, and then used the wonderful “Everything” file-search tool to find lingering elements directories and annihilate them, and similarly search-and-destroyed the registry, and then the reinstall worked great! ... Or at least organizer ran twice without hanging-up ... three times! ... Before my purge, the hard drive was of course littered with the junk left behind by elements 10 and elements 15, not to mention the trial photoshop/lightroom, so it was very likely some little stupid file or ancient or too-new catalog gave it heartburn. ... But all copacetic now!
TO IMPORT STUFF INTO ORGANIZER 10 from WITHIN: “File / Get Photos and Videos ...” “From Files and Folders”. I pasted into the “File name:” field “c:\b\MyPix\AdobeTests\” and added a “*” and pressed ENTER. Then I clicked one of the images and selected it, and then typed control-A for “select all”. And then clicked “Get Media”. After various errors — I tell it to do whatever it wants — eventually I had a wonderful page of images, and that’s how you do it, in elements 10 and 15, and CC lightroom. ... As I’ve noted relentlessly, I prefer a batch file from xnview/faststone/irfanview to invoke the elements editor on a picture. ... Finally, giving the organizer a command-line path as an argument stirs it into importing images from there, just like lightroom.
And then I discovered late in life I can just right-click a directory in organizer 10 and import it! Of course it seems to have hung-up forever “generating thumbnails” in my vast 4,000-file pix directory....
DON’T try to “get” “c:\” like I did the first time lo these many weary years past. Elements will probably try for hours until it crashes.
“Edit / preferences” is where that’s at. And “View”, check “show file names” if for some reason you’re so nosy you want to know the names of the files the thing is displaying.
Most of my drivel above concerning organizer 15 and lightroom for that matter — excluding all the latest super features — applies to the version 10 organizer.
The elements 10 editor’s got raw, although it occasionally complained about an obsolete something — which with my antique cameras at any rate is not a problem. ... And the various little fixit things seemed to perform admirably, and the editor is indistinguishable from the version 15 rendition. Until you look for dehaze....
I feel a serene sense of mulishness as I delve about in my reinstalled elements 10 and my firewall fires and I tell it to “disable all”. ... Elements 10 is just as sleazily promotional as elements 15, tempting us to sign-up and take advantage of all the wonderful online treats, but presumably in 2011 a product as internet-addicted as elements 15 would’ve been unsaleable. ... And gee the beat goes on: elements 15 is $80 @ 12/8/16 amazon! Lucky internet-addiction-prone foto fans....
It may actually be possible to buy an un-internet-addicted cheapo elements 10 even today, although Adobe obviously doesn’t enthusiastically approve. Googling elements 10 gets some hits, including dubious ebay offers for <$20, so who knows? There are also the usual scurilous downloads and non-existent products. ... Please note that you do need some magic serial numbers that are printed somewhere in the product packaging or it won’t go. ... But basically elements 10 is almost the same as elements 15, without internet addiction, but minus a few bogus features like dehaze. ... And all-in-all, as I keep repeating, the previous-version PSPX is an immensely-better deal....
The elements 10 editor still steals the ESC key from any other program running. ... Compared to the ceaseless internet hammering and malware advertising of version 15, it just seems cute. ... Well I don’t know; it seems to have stopped doing that @ 12/18...?
Quite remarkably, there appears to be no way to specify sort order in the disorganizer view....! Various bread crumbs on the internet suggest this is a continuing “feature” which you will no doubt learn to love.... Some bread crumbs suggsted that I could only do this challenging thing in an “album”, and after exiting and re-entering the disorganizer, a “create instant album” offered itself, which I am now doing, perhaps ’till the end of time. ... So use xn instead. ... Well it never seemed to get anywhere, and then I clicked on the progress window and up popped an advertisement begging me to sign-into my adobe account and know perfect bliss. I didn’t. ... However the “create instant album” progress box went away....
2.
While I’m lambasting vile paint programs I certainly should give
honorable
mention to the vile Serif
PhotoPlus,
a 2011 copy of its X5 version I got for $20 just for fun, which it
wasn’t. Instead, it appears to be a copy-protection vehicle with
accouterments of a paint program which I never got to investigate with
the constant hammering of the registration virus. And in my deathless
diskette records there’s at least one previous offense where the
malware was offered as a “free” treat on the brit PCPro
DVD which, after a month,
presumably
so the victim could get addicted, triggered the registration
psychosis. ... And it occurs to me that its demand for phone
registration
was not some artifact of my firewall
defenses and/or
ancient
days; the “free
treat” also demanded it, and they’re doubtless a telemarketing
scam masquerading
as a paint program! The
helpful operator
will
almost-certainly
upsell the heck out of you if you should be so foolish as to actually
attempt the phone registration.
... Another contender in the copy-extortion malware advertising sweepstakes is Serif’s macintosh “photoshop-alike” “Affinity”, and the latest “Affinity Photo 1.5” is also available for Windows but I’m not willing to spend the $50 to find out just how DRM-encumbered it is. It isn’t for sale @ amazon — only at Affinity, probably because amazon accepts returns for undisclosed defects, which is what I did with the wily Serif PhotoPlus. Maybe Affinity demands phone registration too! — or worse. ... But really, after my delightful experiences with Elements 15 and the eternal-slavery Photoshop, Serif’s just an innovative pioneer in paint program scammery, blazing a trail Adobe merely follows....
3. Both the perspective tool and the deform tool in PSP9 have complicated demands which I don’t always understand. I’m pretty sure I have to select (i.e. normally) first, before clicking the deform tool. But I could be wrong. ... But do remember to uncheck the stupid “crop image” box! That may’ve been only one of my many problems with the playful paint programs....
4. I run all my paint programs and many others through intricate batch files, one of whose duties is to modify various registry entries so the program will “see” the directory it was started in, which of course is otherwise forbidden in modern software. This in aid of using my beloved OwenShow directory/file browser effectively.
5. I thought I could “fix” my PSPX-perspective-correction but the requisite “deform” tool was AWOL, but I found it somewhere. And it turns-out that PSPX9 also has a “warp mesh” tool which works like the paintshop thing. ... Although it’s true, the more I do this somehow the less I know....
6. The speed of various image browsers is often only apparent but still no less desirable. The otherwise admirable Irfanview, for instance, will not let you do anything with the browsed images until they’re all checked-in, while PSPX/PSP9 browse in a presumably-separate thread, and as you scoot about the browser list they’ll start reading the images you’ve gotten-to — in my case, usually the later sorted-by-date ones — before bothering to go back and fill in the rest. The Adobe products probably work that way, at least the Bridge browser probably did; the Adobe interface is so bolixed I’d need to spend lots more time to figure-it out and I’m not going to do that....
Browsers
&
Directories: I should explain that
even my beloved PSPs
would require
click-click-clicking through a directory tree to get to the desired
directory to browse — if
I hadn’t jiggered my super-geek
batch files to supply them with a full-path directory argument in the
“browse.bat” file, whereupon they all spring into action browsing
the
specified directory. Just
like adobe lightroom and elements organizer — except
that the
default adobe behavior is to stick all the imported images into the same catalog
so they’re all stuck together. PSP and the free browsers
treat each directory individually,
and the browser displays a directory tree next to it, indicating where
you’re browsing at, and supporting changing directories. Making Adobe
behave that way
would undoubtedly be a
whole lot of trouble which I
wouldn’t advise. Which is one of the many reasons I suggest getting
an
old PSPX version instead of
even the exciting Elements 10 versions that might be available....
7. My CDR32.FLT zeroizing strategy is difficult/impossible in modern Windows OSs, if your psp is installed in the default windows stupid program directories. Which is why I always install everything I can, especially paint programs, in user directories like my beloved “c:\pgmjunk”. Most install programs let you do that, after weary years of Usux™ treachery, although sometimes you have to select the super-sophisticated expert install mode or something. Indeed, my ancient PSPs might not work at all in the default Windows directory, what with usux™’s unending concern for our welfare. ... Any directory you want will do, although I make my special root-ed pgmjunk so it’ll be easy to find. ... The point of the Windows-default program directories is to protect your software from you the wittle stupid crazed user, who might want to do crazed silly things like zeroing CRD32.FLT. ... Which is why I install even the up-to-the-minute PSPXs in my pgmjunk directory. And elements....
8. Adobe Help: I must concede that whenever I can get an accurate name for one of the menacing would-be monopoly’s features, googling it has led me to a well-written description of the thing + useful pictures. It’s too bad they couldn’t get the program’s help to work that way. ... And the magic isn’t as good for the lesser Elements 15 which hasn’t the eternal slavery distinction. ... But the adobe products do have a pdf manuals. ... Lightroom; Photoshop; Elements 15; Organizer?....
9. In the fullness of time, and
after
reading a book (!) I concluded that Paint
Shop Pro 9 Text (a.) should have the foreground “material”
transparent,
with the background
set to whatever you want the text to be, and (b.) should be of the vector
flavor. Which can be resized later, or even right-clicked into amazing
changes. ... Or something like that; it’s still not easy. ... And
actually I should note that
the “Paint Shop Pro 9 User Guide” available for a pittance
used
at
amazon was actually readable & useful!
10. My “old” Paint Shop Pro 9 turned-out to have dubious provenance. Consulting my extravagant archives, it seems that my $25 amazon edition is obviously bogus, the DVD-box graphic being apparently copied at too-low resolution. ... Although I suppose it could’ve been a legit manufacturing-debacle thing. ... But lookee here! @ 12/24/18 there are still Paintshop Pro version 9s still available at amazon open-box used for as low as $55. Almost certainly not worth the trouble even at $0, but I like it....
11. Elements 15 Redux: after uninstalling the Adobe advertising robot + a soothing cooling-off period, I installed the frolicsome malware on my derelict HP win7 crate where I had previously put my test elements 10. At its new home, Elements 15 continued to impress, with its fabulous aprés install missing organizer mouse cursor, consequently stuck at full-screen. As before. ... And I never heard the fan on the derelict HP in the past! Very impressive. ... Since at that time my beloved cranky HP seemed headed for its last round-up, it seemed a not inappropriate resting place for my Adobe quarantine. Although now that I’ve resurrected the thing, I’ve decided I’ll live with the monster, for a while, although I may regret it. I like keeping a copy around just to satisfy occasional wonderings. ... And now that I’ve finally given-up on the HP at last, the adobe advertising kiosk has a fitting receptable....
Anyway, after the AE15 install on the derelict HP crate, a reboot didn’t arouse the organizer mouse pointer. Eventually it showed-up briefly when I went to the organizer from the Elements 15 editor, but the organizer gave-up the ghost again, with an alarming white screen. ... Somewhere around the 10th try I got the mouse, and was able to resize the stupid window. Along the weary way, the windows task manager appeared to crash or at least get cranky, and a desperate user log-off attempt brought-up typical complaints about programs o’erstaying their welcome — isn’t it the truth? — but eventually I somehow got organizer 15 to stop terminal white screen flashing — which happened a few times after I got a mouse cursor but foolishly tried to move the organizer window, whereupon a few more white screen flashes were followed by a permanent white screen. But at long last it settled down, again. ... I note that when organizer 15 comes-up, there’s an info screen with many developers’ names, with the bottom line incompetently sliced-off.
12. An
amazon review of PSP X9 suggested that Adobe
was buying
copies of the program to produce “verified purchaser” bad reviews.
Which
sounds ridiculous, but I had
noticed that a one star review explicitly recommended buying
Photoshop
instead. Which of course is impossible — you
can only
rent
it, for life, and that does
suggest a
partisan scam....
13.
I think it was in the days of photoshop’s “content-aware-patch”
puffery campaign that
I first
encountered the Adobe product, apart from vague rumor, in some online
thing
— where it was
obvious that it’d work great in a perfect demo, maybe not so good
with
real pictures. ...
Whenever
one uses one of these magic things, it often won’t do what you want
when
you
want it, no matter how
clever. This is made obvious by occasional ads in some puffy
photo mag for a “select” service which’ll do the tedious
magic
selection work for you
for a few bucks. ... Although surely one must occasionally encounter
pictures that need some little thing erased with “magic fill”
—
although I can’t remember one. But it’s fun to watch it up
to
its
deviltry .
14. Maybe I was supposed to make a new psp9 vector layer as transparent as I want, and use the object white boxes with unchecked borders. The resulting image will of course be incompatible with the beloved fast & less-cranky psp5. Or I can just keep using psp5, which I think is a pretty good solution. ... But actually it turns-out squares just default to objects in the newer better stupider PSPs! And what I was supposed to do was — uncheck “Create On Vector”! ... Of course! So stupid! I should’ve known. We all should’ve known. Everything. All the stuff hidden under the couch, so you won’t be bothered, ’cause it’s just so obvious!
15. The
esteemed brit PhotoPlus
magazine
had a “review” of Elements 15 (page 106, 1/17). And the “01”
callout
there
explains “Your folders
are listed on the left of the Organizer. Click on one, and you’ll
see
all the images it contains” which is entirely untrue — unless
you
already “imported” them yourself; the disorganizer is ignorant.
... These reviews are presumably puffery direct from the Adobe mothership, so it appears somehow they’ve become concerned that it’s so easy with most other image browsers (including the free ones, and even Windows File Explorer on a good day) to see the pictures in a directory, so they’re going to pretend that Elements’ll show ’em too! ... Problem solved, with a simple dose of standard marketing lies....
The gushing puffsters somehow forgot that you have to put them there first. Shown is probably a “list” format, but you can also get a real directory tree, just like psp for 18 years & the free irfanview & faststone & xnview, but you still must import the pictures using the elements disorganizer to actually see them. And if you know about the directory tree you can, apparently, right-click on a directory and import right from there! ... Of course you have to know ahead of time that there’re pictures in there, which kind-of negates the whole picture browser concept.
... Maybe the idea is you’d use an actual working free picture browser like irfan etc. to see what/if pictures are there, and then goto to your beloved organizer version 15 to import them from that directory. And you’d have to set the directory to be “watched” if you wanted to see any new pictures that’d show up in it. ... Makes a tremendous lot of sense, don’t it? ... And the super-deluxe lightroom also works this way, lucky fotofans. ... Of course you could just use the free browser instead of the silly organizer/lightroom program. .... Perhaps the disorganizer’s new-found directory feature makes it a little easier to use in a rational way; perhaps they’ll fix it better in version 16, to be as good as the 1998 psp5. ... And apparently all this time my Organizer version 10 has worked like this too! The feature’s much better hidden (Display (!) / Folder view) but works the same useless way, as my pitiful antique dummies book circuitously admitted.
... And then the kindly Brian Worley in the 4/17 brit canon puffery mag PhotoPlus (p 96) in a organizer “how-to” admits that he doesn’t browse with lightroom — presumably; because you can’t — but stores his images in his own directory structure of year and month folders/subfolders, and perhaps yet more subfolders for different cameras, and renames the files with year/month 4-digit prefixes. I.e., he knows how to operate the computer and use the directories, knowledge assumed to be forbidden to the children of Elements and Lightroom. ... He uses the $150 (one-time! no lifetime slavery!) Photo Mechanic program “to manage the initial import of files.” There’s a 30-day trial for Photo Mechanic which I’m doing for the heck of it, and it appears to be an acceptable image manager/browser which my free browsers clearly surpass. Of course they weren’t around when he started with Photo Mechanic “15 years” ago, and it’s also got the unique “ingest” feature, which is basically for transferring the images from your camera CF/SD card to your harddrive, and I assume he uses ingest’s “IPTC Stationery Pad” to add “metadata to the files on import”, rename them, and implement his desired directory structure. ... He describes Lightroom as a “cataloguing system” and claims to use it for that, but I know he wouldn’t diss a sponsor....
16. After I relentlessly abused Corel aftershot attempting to make it figure-out what directory it was in — its Windows registry entries live in a delusional macintoshy world of forward-slashed directory names — anyway, I abused it and it forgot the pictures in my AdobeTests directory. After truly endless delving I found
c:\Users\owner\AppData\Local\Corel\AfterShot 2\cache\
and renamed it to etc.NOT, and aftershot worked perfectly for ever after. ... That’ll be $39.95 please, cash check or money order.
... Oh! I think I get it! ... See aftershot’s supposed to be like the stupid & annoying lightroom/disorganizer, and has a library/catalog “File / Import Photos from Folder...” thing which presumably, in succeeding editions, evolved into today’s actual browser, but still has a few extra gills and rudimentary flippers left around. I tinkered with the feature and didn’t get anywhere much, but I did discover, when I tried to install an external editor, it’d drop TIF versions of whatever I was trying to external edit in whatever happened to be the current directory. For all I know lightroom does that too; I never got that far. ... Maybe I could’ve fixed my missing pictures problem with the catalog, or not ... or maybe somehow I’d gotten stuck in the “library” view, where missing pictures are perfectly normal?
... Incidentally there are apparently at least two flavors of aftershot, the peasant and the pro, the former of which is what one gets with the “ultimate” PSPX. ... Who knew? I have no idea what the distinction is....
17. I actually tried some of the older PSPs in my historic collection. PSP version 4 wasn’t bad, but before that there was only 16-bit darkness. I did install the 1992 psp version 1.2 into my vbox xp, but it was not inspiring — it knew not the jpg, only BMPs and GIFs. ... However, it looked like PSP9, the last Jasc version....
18.
It finally occurred to me that widespread fumfering about ridiculously
expen$ive
“tilt shift” lenses — an ancient
photographic gadget for taking “architectural” pictures of
tall
buildings so they’d have straight lines — is yet another
fab foto feature shot down by simple computer trickery, in this case
the 2004 psp9 perspective fixer
— actually it was in the 10/03
psp8! ... Things like this modérne $3,400
“tilt-shift” Nikon
lens ... “or as Nikon calls it,
Perspective Control lens” probably’ve made the photo scam biz
a lot of
money over
the years, so no wonder
the equivalent paint shop pro feature’s been a defcon 5 level secret!
... But now (2/17) the magazines and web
sites puff software
magic as their Adobe
masters have ordered, since Adobe got around to their own “guided
upright” after all these years, which can indeed do the same
“perspective
control” as the ridiculously-co$tly
lenses; as does my 2003 psp8. ... I considered cruelly commenting on
the
DPReview puff,
but the existing chittery is so pitifully, credulously faithful it’d
be heartless; + I’d just be trolled to bits.
... And it occurs to my relentlessly suspicious thought processes that cheaply-available software equivalents are why so much tilt-shift puffery emphasizes the other things the silly len$es can do, mostly involving varying depths-of-field within one image, to make these truly jejune “miniature-looking” mostly-urban landscapes — that is, tilt-shift puffery conceals the readily-available software magic that’ll straighten-out building — and other perspectives; there are actually separate programs that do this, flogged to the ignorant — but the puffery nevertheless pays ridiculous attention to the sillier talents of your $3.4K lens. ... Well I guess it’s like the B&W cameras....
DxO
Viewpoint 3 vs. Photoshop Adaptive Wide Angle
The ~$80 DxO Viewpoint is a dedicated “tilt-shift” effects program which, along with perspective correction includes the selectively-out-of-focus “tiny town” effect now emphasized by the ridiculou$ lens puffs. And then an “Adaptive Wide Angle” article (p 48 Outdoor Photography 5/17) shows that the photoshop so-named tool is better than photoshop’s “Free Transform Tool” which appears to be exactly like psp’s perspective fixit thing. And in the extensively-manipulated example, the adaptive whats-it is better; but it sounded like work. ... The author explains how he didn’t use his tilt-shift lens ’cause the sites wouldn’t like a tripod. ... And really, my beloved PSP perspective correction isn’t perfect but good enough for government work and my humble delvings. So I downloaded the non-lifetime-slavery DxO “Viewpoint 3” 31-day demo, which achieves miraculous effects with the demo pictures, but doesn’t seem to do much better than psp9 and all the PSPXs. I mean, it has an “auto” button, so I don’t have to erect a little rectangle, although it’ll let me do that if I want, but there was no way I could find to get as good a result as in the guy’s photoshop adaptive wide angle. And I don’t think the “auto” button’s worth $80 or whatever the fare is. ... DxO support, in answer to my piteous pleas, said “in order to get full compatibility between your files and ViewPoint, there must be complete camera and lens information in the files you use in the program” — apparently its major talent is supposed to be correcting wide-angle pix for which you have such lens “EXIF” info.
... But it does have a tilt-shift “miniaturizing” effect which for some reason I didn’t get around-to trying....
19. @ 3/17, I finally broke-down and got PSP X9 Ultimate at a bargain basement $42. ... And the X9 annoyanceware screen included a checkbox for “don’t-pester-if-offline” although since I checked it, I can’t see the exact message anymore since I’m always offline for PSPX with my trusty firewall, and that works pretty good. It’ll probably turn-on me in blind fury someday, but it hasn’t yet (1/19). ... And at a later installation, I learned that it seemed I had to click the “register” button a few times, and have it fail, with the firewall stymying it, before it’d offer the “don’t-pester” checkbox. And who knows? Might’ve worked with other versions. Or not. ... So I will concede that without the annoyance screen, and once I learned to give-up my registry tinkering and just use the stupid PSPX tree display, PSPX isn’t so bad. ... I’ve seen worse. And then I learned about the collections, and all was serene & beautiful.
... But the major feature of all these paint programs is keepin’ up with the latest cameras, which is really kind of ghoulish in these camera-phoning days of decline & despair....
The high point of the PSPX9 installation (at least with the “Ultimate” edition) was the Aftershot 3 serial #’s two “W”s in the cute Corel computer print on the disc envelopes, which could not be distinguished from various combinations of Vs and Ws — so frolicsome! ... But then it turned-out, as if to make-up for the less-annoying pspx9, Aftershot 3 requires permanent internet registration — over and over again, i.e. slavery — so I trashed it. Which suggests one should just buy the non-ultimate X9....
... And PSPX9 forgot my precious canon dslr, and I had to tell it! ... In the raw lab camera fixit section. On the other hand, the free Nik collection still installed good. ... Incidentally, oddly, the Nik collection didn’t work when I just copied the files; it had to be installed — a remnant no doubt of its gloriou$ copy-extorted past. ... And just for old time’s sake: to make the *(&()*& captions appear on the “Manage” tab thumbnails: File / Preferences / General Program Preferences / Manage / check “Show file name with thumbnail images”. And incidentally, PSPX barely fits on a pitiful 1366x768 laptop screen.
... @ 2/19, I’m already at least two PSPs behind, the current version being the glorious PaintShop Pro 2019, a demo of which I downloaded and immediately uninstalled when it informed me I’d have to beg on the internet just to run the demo. Sic transit etc....
20. In the ancient days — last month or so — Lightroom was, in some murky way, available for purchase without eternal slavery. But the jungle drums suggest the era is coming to a close around 10/17.
Hitachi 1TB USB Drive LifeStudio MalwareIt comes with Hitachi advertising malware which I couldn’t delete. On my beautiful imini, I could move the advertising icon down to the corner of the screen so I can hardly see it, but I couldn’t destroy it. There was a fellow on the web with an informative youtube video about how to cripple it a bit, but presumably the malware masters at Hitachi saw it and did something, ’cause his scheme didn’t work. ... I mean if you want to use their advertising junk and learn how to live the exciting Hitachi lifestyle you lucky person, by all means leave the thing strewn all over your computer. ... I did wonder why it was so cheap at microcenter.... I am leaving this antique 6/10 whine here so I will never forget.... |
|
|
God’s
Word for Windows? — 95!
I like to say that I’m such a refined atheist that I don’t even believe in atheism, but of course we kindly old philosopher types like to keep the Holy book around just in case anyway, and for years I’ve been using the previous version of GW4W for my occasional Ecclesiastes poetical needs. ... But then came the age of 64-bits, and the program won’t run. So after scurrying around the internet for a while I managed to locate GW4W again (about 14 megabytes), in the exciting new Windows 95 32-bits flavor, which will run on my 64 bits Windows 7 machine! ... The author says in his manual.wri (an antique Windows text format my WordPerfect X4 can still read!) that we should post it hither and yon and so I will. ... He asks for cash, and I believe I’ve tried to send money in the past, and I may again, but my recollection is returned mail and stale checks.... Oops wait a moment, just didn’t grep enough; here’s a computer record says I sent him $35 @ 3/3/95! ... That’s a while ago.... And oh yes, the program crashes a bit, especially if you poke around in the features. But the basic search ’n’ show thing seems to work OK. ... And really, google is easier; I just spent 10 minutes figuring the thing out again and it isn’t easy. ... But it still runs! ... Hint: apparently it always says “Gensis 1:1” on the top status line, no matter what’s being displayed. If you’ve maximized the text window, like I foolishly did, that doesn’t say what it is. So “normalize” the text window. ... Or use google.... 4/2/24: At least it’s not April Fool’s day. ... So ol’ GW4W doesn’t seem to really work great; it’s confusing and doesn’t make sense. Just like the Bible.... Tue 9/24/24 11:23 am. I’ve briefly used a bible program esword which seemed to work OK. Antique Software versus WindowsSo while I’m at it, lets talk about Vista/Windows 7 versus old software. Here are some bullet points:
The Tender Beauties of the Wondrous Windows 10
HOW TO INSTALL CORELDRAW X4 in WIN10: But then this fellow has a wonderful How-To-Do-It which I found by googling “install coreldraw x4 win10” and which worked good on my pitiful crate. As he warned, it destroyed the Windows “start” menu — that’s the ugly blobby menu — and disabled the “edge” internet browser icon on the task bar also, but these are things I might’ve gotten around-to doing intentionally, although he has a fixit for that which looks fairly perilous, but I might still try it — always with a restore point of course. ... You understand, I’ve created an ISO of the X4 install disc incorporating the glorious mutilations, which I use whenever I need to install the useful-but-annoying program on one of my herd... 8/6/21. WARNING WARNING WARNING: Windows 10 changes every 15 minutes, and when I just tried to implement this silly business I screwed everything up and even forgot to set a restore point! Or save the registry! ... But then again, the PC had some other crochets which seemed to get cured when I reset everything. ... Anyway, on the magic fixit page, “hb9tst” has a post that’s only 2 years old, which I tried. ... And by golly, if it didn’t work good! So here is a zipped PDF CorelFixitIE.zip of the magic page, where I followed the instructions on page 7 after following the X4 install instructions (ALWAYS starting with a restore point!!!), and Lord have mercy on your registry — the “IE” is ’cause it was saved from the antideluvian internet explorer with pdffactory, which procedure creates a searchable document. ... After successfully accomplishing all that, there was the “white menu problem” which, searching in the original post, is addressed thusly: “If you experience white menu bar problem, set up program compatibility to Windows XP SP3”. Which wasn’t all so easy; Windows 10 this week insisted that I go through the whole compatibility test, and it felt Vista was the right choice, which it wasn’t, and only then offered to let me set the stupid thing, to Windows XP SP3, and then it seems to work with a menu, except that every time it runs I have to answer the UAC question — oh I see the heroic Vista had the UAC; XP didn’t. ... Oh well. Of course many hackers run naked without UAC; but I don’t. ... When I set it back to Vista, and then back to compatibility unchecked, if “worked” but the menu was white — until I move the mouse cursor over it, whereupon the menu items would appear. This is probably more fun than the elevated mode, particularly for a inspiring product like coreldraw. So I was gonna congratulate the fellow at the “corel community”, but Corel has really gotten too stupid — I’ve bought Corel X8, only to discover that it was copy-extorted out the kazoo, requiring monthly re-registration — which makes it unusable for high-minded types like myself, for reasons explained here, about fotosux — and so I returned it to Amazon, and somewhere in the malestrom my “community” account got trashed and will never commune again, and it’s just too stupid to make a second one.
... At 12/7/17, Firefox no longer worked on my totally up-to-date lenovo win10™ machine. It ran, but it was invisible; it lurked on the taskbar without format or substance. I eventually “fixed” it by uninstalling & salting the earth — harrowing the registry of every firefox reference — and deleting random “firefox” files, using the beautiful “Everything” file finder, and then installing again. The first time I installed it in a non-windows directory but that was a bad idea, ’cause it wouldn’t show-up in the brilliant Windows 10™ default program thingey, so I went through my probably-pointless rigamarole and it got installed in the decent healthy Win10™ directory, and all was well. I’m assuming the ability to actually display on the win10™ screen is an attribute of the 64-bitness of this firefox, but of course it could be moonphase.... On the other hand, I think Usux™’s given up on their glorious “edge” browser. It’s like, give a project a billion bucks, see what kind of mess it makes ... then forget it. ... The thing can’t see a local HTM file, which makes it useless for trying-out the local copy of this beloved web site, but also for any installable html documentation system that some foolish company might like to employ. Apparently Usux™’s too snooty to support such hum-drum ambitions. ... “Don’t bother us, we’re too busy with surface™” you know.... And then on the third hand, the beautiful and courageous “Brave” browser has the same command-line problem. I guess all the kids are doin’ it....
... But then I discovered Adobe7 did work in windows 10! In my intricate batch file imbroglios, I had been calling “AcroRd32.exe” for some obscure reason, and that didn’t work in win10 — but the obviously preferable “adobe7.exe” worked great. So it was all my fault. ... Although I must admit I’d almost gotten used to the mutilated modérne adobe reader, which has many charming talents once I disabled its annoying disfeature. But now I can mix ’n’ match, and I installed it back into the relatively-harmless Windows 7. The best part is the tabbed interface, so one can see various PDFs without going through the ridiculously-complicated Adobe7 windows menu procedure. ... You understand, in the interval Adobe has inflicted many unspeakable atrocities on the pdf-reader-using public, reaching a nadir in the one-window-for-every-pdf regime of terror & stupidity. So naturally, I’m cautious in dealing with the giant ridiculously-incompetent marvelously-profitable dark force....
But so far, ALT-CONTROL-DEL to bring-up the “task manager” etc. screen and then pressing ESC to dismiss it right-away seems to be a reliable cure for the stuck-focus problem. And the invisible selection? It is really so EZ (I just assumed it was jiggered beyond recall, and apparently it was, once): right-click desktop, “personalize”, “colors”, check “Title Bars” — and voila! Selected windows get their color back. Amazing eh? ... Although that still doesn’t work for Firefox, presumably for the usual unknown mystery reasons. But this ridiculously-hacky fix did work, although even I with my super-powers found it a bit challenging....
And there, as I like to say, is all I know about the subject and so much more! ... So go forth, you lucky folk with antique software, which is how I got on this endless digression. ... The old stuff’s often really fast as opposed to the bloated modérne piffle we all know so well and love so dearly.... Windows 10 Upf--k Notification: CrashWhenever the lovely & gracious piece of dog doo doo wants to upf--k your machine, as it must, repeatedly, to introduce ever scammier fund-raising schemes, it’s easy to tell: your system crashes! ... So simple so straightforward! ... Something will freeze or crash or behave weirdly, I’ll press some buttons and get around to rebooting, and then the lovely & grcious Win10 will run the endless update screens and your computer will brick itself. Probably not forever; but according to reports, sometimes even that. Airplane ModeThe only thing to do to avoid this is
disconnect completely from the internet. And actually that’s not
a
bad
idea on my pitiful derelict hand-me-down machines that just want to
play
a little
music. On a recent asus, it’s FUNC+ Windows 10 Corporate ExtortionI did wonder what Usux™ was getting out of all this, but just assumed the joy of destruction & annoyance was adequate to the obviously-impaired monopoly. But then a Computerworld article referenced by Slashdot cleared the mists — unintentionally it would seem, blowing the gaffe. The articles only discuss the different versions of Windows 10 and which are suitable for “corporate use” — but that elusive quality is, apparently, not getting hammered every 15 minutes with vast machine-disabling-possibly-destructive updates!
Of course the suck-up webbery and pitiful remaining magazines will endlessly extol the wonders of kindly Usux™ giving us these wonders for free as per Usux™ diktat, but even that fades as people figure it out and Usux™ seems to have concluded the better future course will be the usual omerta. ... The redoutable Dvorak had a column on Win10 update c--p, but pretended to be unaware of the corporate extortion angle, just nudging Usux™ to avoid obvious future catastrophes — as is his duty, as an ancient Usux™ columnist/suck-up....
|
A Thoughtful Essay on Visual Studio 2010 Mon 2/28/2011 5:22 pm. So I got around to Microsoft’s
Visual Studio 2010™
just
now, and within 20 minutes
IT
TRASHED MY ORIGINAL SOURCE.
Fortunately I keep backups. ... But for safe computing, I would advise
ISOLATING
VISUAL STUDIO
on a separate machine somewhere FAR
FROM ANY USEFUL WORK.
Probably off your LAN, unconnected; i.e., like a virus. ... This is why
I continue to use the wretched 2000 Borland Builder.....
|
|