My
Broken 2/06 6mp Canon
A540: An Imaginary Enthusiast Point ’n’ Shoot
As an imaginary enthusiast myself, I guess I’m OK with
that —
it’s been a pretty good 6mp
point-n-shoot
camera pretending
to have fancy enthusiast features, but when
I
whirl the mode wheel nothing
remotely related to shutter timing or aperture (Tv, Av, M) ever
showed-up.
...
I’ve
apparently discovered its perfidy in the passing years before, and
forgotten,
as the calendar pages flutter by in the presumably
black
and white movie cliché.
... I vaguely remember struggling with it,
refusing to
read
the manual — it made no **** sense anyway, which of course
it
didn’t — but then in
these latter days I
joined-up with
the
Holy Mirror DSLR cult
and got my
own beautiful
flipping mystery mirror camera,
so I
figured’d now I’d be enlightened-enough at last to master the
inscrutable
A540; I
thought
the
Mirror
Mysteries might somehow show me the hidden truth.
... But they
didn’t. So I searched A540
reviews @ Amazon for “aperture”, “shutter”, and
“ISO”,
and not one
hit gave the
slightest hint of anyone having actually used
the features. ... Even the bad
reviews didn’t complain about that complicated camera stuff.
... An online
site
lauded the P/Tv/Av/M modes and is quite convincing, as if he had a
different,
better,
camera. ... After all this
dubious no-fault-admitted internetery, I actually went and checked my
DSLR
and zoomer,
to verify it was
possible
to adjust aperture etc. with at least some
cameras, and I wasn’t
somehow
trapped in an alternate universe where Av/Tv were all
nonfunctional....
I Am Alone
Finally recollected in tranquility,
I concluded my addled A540 was, if not alone,
at least in a minority. The way the positions on the
shooting mode dial are mostly unrelated to the software behavior (as
explicitly
described on the LCD screen text) —
it
seems too weird for even the most dedicated idiot not to notice. ... Of
course it took me 10 years....
It’s
like a lesser
point ’n’ shoot got grafted onto an
A540 body, in
some hideous Vincent Price-esque experiment gone horribly awry. It
probably
wasn’t
unique — because these computery snafus almost never are —
and was some
kind of manufacturing software who-knows-what screw-up
which uniquified more than a few A540s — and my unerring
instinct
guided me to one such, at the scammy camera stores wherein I
spent so many joyous hours, who no doubt flogged the
thing
to me
at a
bargain price — $180, according to my ancient “diskette”
file entry,
around 12/06. And in my
ignorance and sloth, I didn’t notice/bother to return it and
get
my money back — and Amazon says it had a “199.99
list price”, so I guess I was
roundly gulled indeed in the golden vales of retail cameradom. And not
for
the first or last time....
The A540 cohort, at least the A550, 560,
570, have
lesser point ’n’
shoot
wheels, with only a manual “M” for the pitiful enthusiast,
although
they could have the foto fan functions buried in there, although the
a550 “advanced” manual seems to preserve omerta on the subject
& I
suspect not. However, they physically
resemble
the A540, and might well
have had identical circuit
boards except for a few tiny components you could hardly see, if at
all,
and
perhaps that’s our sad story. ... Apparently the model #s start with
the
a510, which has
an enthusiast model wheel.
How My Broken
A540 Actually Works
Anyway, on reacquaintance I did eventually figure-out
how I was probably
supposed
to set those non-existent speeds and apertures — by pressing the
+/- button and then using the arrow keys (pdf 49 aka p47,
advanced manual, “Manually Setting ...”). In
some of the actual
modes, that
procedure does the exposure
compensation thing (lighten/darken). But my wacko
A540’s mode wheel is still abridged as
per my illustration ;
the top “creative” side just does random “auto”s
and
“portrait”s. ... But it still seems to have video!
The Wonder & the Charm
It’s
really amazing that I could spend a decade without noticing exactly how
this thing doesn’t
work.
I remember being intensely puzzled when I couldn’t set
the
aperture. I could do that with the zoomer
but that wondrous device’d always run out
of power in a few
minutes,
and it seemed the photographic furies were determined to deny me my
high f-stop/depth-of-field in-focus photography. And so they did,
for
around
a
decade. With the assistance of dedicated
industry scammery and, to be sure, my distracted inattention, until the
iphone
camera wiped the slate....
As an inspiring wacko
fluke my impaired point
’n’
shoot has its own special
charm,
and
is eminently
suited for membership in the owenlabs Silly
Camera Collection
— the
entire DSLR concept itself
is a bathetic fake,
so whyever not? There were probably few returns — aberrant A540s
or
DSLRs —
’cause
who knows
what all that foto fan stuff is supposed to do anyway?!?!
Broken A540 versus iPhone
Any
SD camera, even my
wacko
A540, has it over the
iphone
in the getting-hold-of-pictures department — even if, as everybody
knows by now, the phone’s usually a better camera at least considering
it’s
in your pocket and the camera’s
not. ...
I use an intricate
dropbox/wireless
system to get pictures
out of the snooty iphone, and
when
it
works it’s OK. But at a motel for instance I must connect my
computer and
iphone to
the local malware/spam generator — well, if I want the pix soon;
otherwise just the laptop. ... And even at the home base, during the
periodic
wireless router explosions that we all know & love, it’s a
pain.
Of course other non-Apple phones (and
my addled A540) have the SD/µSD
“film”
which can be removed
and stuffed into an inexpensive USB
card reader.
Aside from my A540’s peculiar
disabilities and shamefully low megapixel
count,
its remaining
features are not unlike the iphone’s camera, but better,
with the convenient SD
and a zoom and a viewfinder.
And I don’t believe
in those megapixels
anyway. ... Except for the ravishing Baryta
prints .
... And then, in the wandering
mists of time and computer files, I found that my beloved
gifted
this thing to me, @ xmas
2006! ... So now I can blame her!
... Oh what a relief....
The Time Changes
And then in the
fullness of days & years @ 6/17 the beloved wacko a540’s time
battery
ran out! ... So with my attentive main battery replacement policies,
the time battery lasted over a decade. I know this because I had no
idea there was
a time battery
until I bought the working A540,
so obviously I hadn’t
replaced it before. ... But then I must’ve let the NiMHs
run-down in my “new” A540,
and had to
replace
its
time battery;
again....

A Working A540?
I bought another A540
at
Amazon, where it was $35
used! — but, sadly, too
used; some little component within had fallen over never to get up
again, and it would always plaintively whimper for the date/time every
time it was turned-on. And I returned it to Amazon, no questions asked.
...
And then realized a month or so later the tiny fallen-over part
was the date battery
which if I’d just had half a wit I could’ve gotten it up again
myself!
... The
vendor should’ve supplied the camera in working condition anyway
— or at least
told
me....
But
it did
have more-or-less working software, at least corresponding to the
mode wheel, as opposed to my beloved broken rendition.
... And I did not despair; there were more of them, and as
I was now a
date/time battery expert I
bought one and
some CR1220
date batteries for the same
price — the used A540 got cheaper in the interval, in the
ever-shifting
Amazon used camera market.
The Time Battery
And my new-old A540 came, and its little
coin battery was indeed dead as the dodo, and it remembered not its
date or
time and pestered me at every power-on, as before.
The coin battery’s
rôle,
apparently, is to
power the clock while the user changes the main batteries or opens
the compartment to get the SD
card so he can
look at its pictures on
his
computer. But,
honoring the ancient tradition of retail camera sales — and so the
AA batteries won’t leak and destroy the thing — the vendor
stores it without AA batteries, which puts the whole load on the
coin battery which rapidly depletes, and of course who would
ever think
of
installing new
batteries, coin or AA, for the sale?!? ...
So replacing the CR1220 coin battery cured its pitiful memory
lapse and now it is perfect and good as
new.
... Well actually its LCD & viewfinder are more scarred than my
carefully-preserved
broken unit, but that’s
just more authenticity....
And
my
original poor confused A540 has retired to a Silly Camera shelf —
on top of its original
box! —
to
photograph no more forever ... well at least until the “new”
old one
breaks. I
did an SD-ectomy so the
decade’s worth
of A540 pictures live on in
their new/old resurrected home. ...
But I will cherish
my time of A540 mystery as a
kind
of
photographic anti-paradisiacal Tempest,
where I played the brave-new-world innocent — since I was obviously
not the wizard....

3/18.
@ 8/7/11 I got my
despised-for-years
2/11
12mp Kodak
Z990 30x zoom for $216.99 new,
and it
is mentioned around this enchanting site with
scorn & derision
but never actually officially enrolled
amongst the silly cameras, here, where it undoubtedly belongs. ...
&
in the
fullness
of time I made my peace
with it, and it is, after all, not so
noxious compared to the vast cornucopia of dubious fraudulent digital cameras.
... And I suppose it could be my go-to raw HDR
zoomer, whenever I feel occasional fits of rationality threatening to
overwhelm
me. Although the G2, a
non-zoomer, but with
tiny 4mp
raw pictures, is probably a more likely delusional candidate; except
the
Z990 is
stupider. ... It’s got a super snooty
cmos sensor
that, unlike my sx30,
isn’t
broken. ... Yes I
just
checked 6/24/18 and it isn’t. And it’s advertised @ amazon
as having especially wonderful low-light performance! Although the
reviewers
seem to dispute that....

5/16. I was having so much fun I thought I’d
get a (2011) A1200 with 12
megapixels
— the
same extravagant resolution as the sacred ~2008 DSLR
itself — and only $52 used @ amazon. ... They seemed to have dumped
the
point ’n’
shoot
viewfinders
after that — the cheap flavor anyway
—
which is why
I am doomed
to live in the battery-conserving
past —
but that’s right, my beloved viewfinders are ecological!
Who knew?!?!
... But I reached too
far: the glories of the mode wheel, that were
so peculiarly broken on my original A540,
were buried
or worse
in the A1200 menus, and
in my unseemly
hobbyist enthusiast haste I didn’t notice
there is no way to
set the aperture or
exposure;
it’s
compulsory automatic — all that’s left is that pitiful deceptive
“P”,
providing access to a dubious group of supposedly “creative”
tricks.
So, failing to cancel in time, I considered
returning the precious artifact which displeaseth me, and enduring
shameful
Amazon penalties.
...
Then again,
it’s so cute.
And it still has a viewfinder.
And its primitive “P”
mode
provides exposure-compensation
at least,
an
actually-useful feature for those who want to capture images of
anything other than standard portraits — in my case, the sun-dappled
woods through a cabin window. And as I actually bother
using these silly features, it turns-out I can leave the flash off
in the “P” mode, and on
in “auto”, suppressing the minor annoyance of turning the
flash off/on (i.e. with software + buttons) which I otherwise
experience with the adorable devices, and thus more conveniently
accommodate convulsive snapshotting &
delusional art pix. ... But still no baryta
paper....
And the only
reason I want
the megapixels is for occasional detail extraction (i.e. with a paint
program), which I could
do with the sacred DSLR
or the zoomer
but as I’ve probably failed to conjure-up despite these endless
diatribes,
I
find those devices — DSLR/zoomer
— too annoying for casual/ez use — although
they are beautiful
and sacred, at least if I turn the LCD
off.
... And actually, despite my preoccupation with f-stops and other
snooty foto-fan technical arcana, all my antique digital camera images
then and
now
were
actually taken in AUTO,
except
for my pitiful would-be high f-stop zoomer
failures. ... And so the A1200’ll
be my end-of-the-road marker in my poignant early-onset-ancien
camera
adventures:
thus
far can I go on the silly camera road, but no further. ... And
it fits in the
fallen Nikon’s tiny
(brandx) camera bag.
...
But then after quite a while I forgot how to turn-off
the
LCD
in “auto” mode! I actually tried to “make-do” with
the SCN (“scene” mode wheel setting) portrait thing before
I
realized with extravagant embarrassment
it wasn’t
the
auto mode
but I had mistakenly selected the “easy” heart-in-a-camera
mode
... which, of course,
lights-up the halogen-bright LCD without choice or quibble. The actual
auto is
perfectly content to work without the LCD. ... Whew. ... But oh, look ,
they included a fisheye effect!
Silly Camera Tip
As alluded-to above,
I figured-out how to set the “P” mode on the A1200 an fstop-or-so
dark
— 1⅓ actually —
and it turns-out that numerous compositions involving sunlight and
shadow are good that way. Not people probably, but mysterious shadow
and light patterns, indoors and out. ... Chiaroscuro.
The
effect could easily be achieved, no doubt, with the beloved paint
program
brightness/contrast adjustments, but that would be cheating....

$tupid
Market
So as I retrospectively progressed through the golden
years of cute
Canon cameras,
my options became limited,
as the beloved photography
market got ever $tupider.
... When I stumbled upon the transcendently-obscure $16 five mp
Canon A610,
the only
cheapo
version I could find @ amazon with a decent mode wheel and more pixels
— a
mere 8mp
— was the ~$40 A630.
And
I am
limiting myself to Canons,
but I’m
assuming the featureitis tracks-enough (or worse) to hardly be worth
bothering
about, and my broken
latch experience with my Nikon
(and
a Kodak point ’n’ shoot in
another age) enhances my Canon prejudices, since nothing physical’s
broken
off my beloved Canons. And really my broken A540
served
me well as an often turned-to point & shoot, even
if I
never figured-out how it worked, because it didn’t.
And I consider
Canon the
originator of the
ur-silly
camera, the millennial
~$3K (body-only of course) EOS
D30
DSLR. ... Well,
the cheapest originator
— there was also the Nikon
D1 (~$4.5k) & Fujifilm
S1 Pro
(~$3.5k). ... And then in “How to choose the right camera for the
eclipse” p 50 Astronomy
4/17 the fellow writes that “the first successful commercial full-frame
DSLR was the Canon
1D, introduced in 2002.” ... Anyway I think Canon
gets the prize, and obviously dominates the
pitiful
tattered remaining market
today, because
it won the competitive/promotional sweepstakes no doubt at least
partly
because the Canons worked
better.
Mostly....
But back in the
real world, Amazon’s got a used
2006 10mp Canon
A640 —
the more-pixels sister of my A610
— for $100; $170 for the 12mp 2007 A650!
...
Obviously
some other
lunatics are buying these cameras, probably for reasons like mine
—
viewfinder, aperture/shutter adjustment —
even if the prices are
hurtful
to my tender sensitivites. ... I imagine at least some purchasers are
those whose beloved old Canon finally bit the dust and, after
investigation,
couldn’t stand the au
courant
overpriced/performance dungeon....

The
8/07
12mp Canon
A650 IS 6x
zoom &
the Batteries
of Doom (&
Deoxit)
After a few days, my fiendishly-expensive $170 A650 turned
on me & snarled — with an almost invisible upside
down “change batteries”
message on the LCD,
which
I wouldn’t’ve seen
if I’d turned the LCD to its protective position — and otherwise
was silent and dead. Cruising through denial & anger I arrived
at bargaining
and googled
“canon
a650 recharge batteries message”
and found yesterday’s
innocent
victims bending up bits of metal in the battery compartment which
oddly I haven’t done yet with any
of the cameras (until the sp310),
although it’s a common laboratory procedure for balky
battery
clocks & etc. ... And naturally, many of the complaints were
indistinguishable
from the super bright LCD
battery-failure
feature common
to all the digital cameras.
So I changed batteries a few times, all
of which
worked good, even the original set, which in itself
implies
intermittent contact problems just as the googled
complained — those batteries didn’t get stronger in the
trash. ... I
looked in the battery compartment with a light and the little
spring-up things seemed of excellent attitude & springiness.
The
battery door has cute intricate little bits of metal and plastic and
perhaps
in
the
wandering years a bit of gunk/corrosion got somewhere somehow, randomly
reappearing to appall the innocent silly camera fan. But I
applied the sovereign remedy
DeOxit
to the batteries + compartment, using a
toothbrush on the door, and still
it works, after the passage of days
(and, eventually, months & years).
...
And I am
bemusedly-content, and my bargain/nostalgia hunt has paused with a
point
’n’
shoot around the same price
— and
date
— as my beloved & sacred DSLR.
... Of course
I then proceeded to further curatorial
/ senseless and most importantly cheaper
acquisition
activities....
Marvels
of the East ...
From
Dpreview
I learned of a guy
who validates my idiotic purchase by taking the most amazing snowflake
pictures with an a650.
He has
astonishingly complex
elaborations, including the “well-known lens reversal macro technique”:
he
attached his a650 and a
respectable 50mm lens pointing
the wrong way in
front of it on a board holding them together.
|
CHDK Hack
He
also
uses “CHDK
—
Canon Hack Development Kit” which is “resident” on his
SD
card and lets him take holy raw
pictures (sort-of) + heaven knows what else, but the CHDK web site @
http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK had at least one couldn’t-close pop-up
on a linked
page
when I visited one
dark & stormy night, strange &
marvelous as it undoubtedly is. ... Eventually I rewarded the snowflake
guy for
his wonder and beauty by buying a snowflake tote bag from him
— which didn’t
get
me investigated by that comey
guy.
... But I should note my attempt to use the fabled CHDK
failed
utterly when I tried with my beloved sx20,
involving the usual endless digressions/infuriations. ... Some stupid
things
require one to read every
page
in the manual, ’cause there is no PDF and no index, but CHDK appears
to require one to read every
page on
the internet — but there is
google, which eventually informed me that no, of course, I couldn’t
use
the 3rd recommended method after the first 2 had failed. When the 4th
method failed twice, I gave up. ... Further pitiful attempts on my A650
didn’t seem to go much better, even ’though the snowflake guy
was there before. ... Software, after all as is well known, rots;
and this
stuff has probably rotted while the world found-out the amazing
superlative astonishing advantages of raw
processing.... ... Latter DaysAnd then as the golden days
passed in splendor and the eternal democrat plague
took hold of the world and nearby star systems — around Tue
10/26/21 10:32 am — I realized that the a650 was nearly the most
perfect of silly cameras, and so I bought another on ebay for $70. ...
I’d realized, as we wandered through the junk stores of America,
plague
or no plague, that although I have been
bringing along the more luxurious silly cameras — specifically the
sx20, and when that was too annoying, the
s5 — I never actually took pictures with
them anymore, because my Pixel
was so much more convenient. ... But I still like to feel I have a
fallback, should I want to do something stupid with f-stops or
shutter speeds, and
the a650 fills the bill admirably....

Money
for Nothing
I toyed with getting a
modérne
point ’n’ shoot
with appropriate enthusiast features and viewfinder, but once I
figured-out how to petition the oracle — I beseeched Amazon for
“electronic
viewfinder camera” —
there wasn’t much. There were hordes
of recent ≥$500 cameras, but the few recent “cheap” zoomers
included a 2014 16mp
Nikon
P530, $235,
and
a 2010 14mp Fujifilm
FinePix
S2800HD
for $180 / $90 used. ... Both with aperture/shutter/manual modes
and the precious EVF.
... But
indeed these are but my
already-EVFed Kodak
zoomer + a few tortured
years of dubious featureitis / pixels, and they stir not my gadget
lust
nor
joy.
To my considerable surprise there are
actually Canon non-DSLR optical viewfinder
cameras from as late as 2012, at least the ridiculously costly $590
Canon
PowerShot G1 X was still for sale at Amazon. However its
glittering $650
successor the 2014
Canon
PowerShot G1 X Mark II has only an “electronic (optional)”
viewfinder, the $202
Canon EVF-DC1, making an $852 EVF
point ’n’ shoot! Which pricing level seems to be common
these
days.
... And shamefully, the Mark II’s
got fewer megapixels
—
12.8 versus the G1 X’s 14.3!
... So eventually, I turned
to a beautiful used 2009 sx20
which, I
concluded, was the perfect & ultimate zoomer,
and filled
my heart with joy....

My 5/02
2mp
Nikon Coolpix 2000:
The
Forgotten Point ’n’ Shoot
A thing of beauty no doubt, and I found
seventy
images from it on at
least one CompactFlash
and an archived CDR
—
but I had no memory of the camera. ... My only clue was when pspx8
reported the pictures
were from a “Nikon E2000” and I don’t doubt it, but it
must’ve
snuck
into my hands and out because as opposed to all my other revered
treasures
it has left not a trace except for the jpegs. ... Well actually it
turned-out I had a folder stuffed with the manual and everything, and
an
undated
Walmart web receipt, but
I got it for $250 @ 2/2/03; I must’ve been flush in those days! ...
But
no camera; maybe the battery door broke off as usual, and I tossed it —
shamefully not foreseeing I might’ve rescued it with blue
tape & a screwdriver.
...
But nevertheless it will not be
left
behind and it is memorialized here, for so many
minutes as this web page shall last. ... Apparently I happily took
pictures with this viewfinderless
thing
from 2/03 to 6/08. And even
bought a few “Digital Camera” magazines along the way! ...
Oh
the
ruined temples ... the fallen idols....
It
Is Found!
After
bleak months & years of sorrowful absence, the devious little
device was found hiding in a cardboard box in a little soft camera
case, where I exhumed it to frolic in its endless primitive joy
once again. ... It appears to contain mostly vocational
pictures (like its successor),
nearly filling the
capacious 64Mb compact
flash
card. I gather the pitiful plot was something like I’d filled the
card,
and would have to take stern measures like off-loading stuff and
archiving — which I did indeed do somewhere, on a CDR,
but much easier
was just buying another dubious Nikon
with a giant
SD card. And thus
my memory hole: it was an
attic
camera, for grotty work,
not
art & beauty like the
downstairs suspects. Although certainly there was crossover, notably my
pitiful Z990 which I
believe I originally
got in a wildly-unsuccessful attempt to document various junk....

9/00
Kodak
1mp DC3200
I do
seem to run
through these things, but at least I remember
my 2001 Kodak DC3200 perfectly well — $216 @ 1/01! — and of
course it has a secure
place in the silly camera collection. And an adorable genuine Kodak
soft case!
... I took numerous undated 1mp
images through its viewfinder, filling-up a compact flash card or
so with its tiny 200k jpeg files. Its battery door
broke after a few months, and Kodak sent me a “refurbished”
replacement
upon my indignant complaint. ... But the batteries lasted
OK — no “live” view
in
those dark days.

Aiptek
CUO-L22
And who could forget the tiny
beloved Aiptek? ... Apparently the entire internet, where it googles
not. A
discard of the LOL, it
is without viewfinder but takes very fine 1mp
pictures and
videos.
We bought it in a bubblepack in Walmart or Target. ... And I forgot or
never
knew it can take 3mp
jpegs! ... But
it still seems to have a poor opinion of 2GB SD
cards.
... My forgotten media
nevertheless contain many fondly-remembered images
which’ve appeared on my countless screen
savers about owenlabs for years,
even as I forgot the cameras.
... And now they’ve come home to the silly camera collection; in
paradise.
... Including my beloved broken A540....

2/10
12mp
Nikon Coolpix L22
But
then another Nikon bubbled-up in the mists, which I have undoubtedly somehow confused
with the beautiful
Coolpix 2000. This
L22 — no relation apparently
of my tiny Aiptek — I got at
best buy @ 9/26/10
for $119.47, and it also
has no viewfinder!
... What a fan I was! ... And it also
has an assortment of beautiful images from its up-to-date SD
card, but fewer than the elusive e2000.
Not
as beloved
apparently; but, like the e2000,
mostly
attic work-related
junk. ... This Coolpix survived in the
flesh,
until I took its last picture, in Florida,
and the battery/card
door
broke off, as is not uncommon with the crummier sillier cameras. ...
Sadly
I
retired it to the silly camera shelf nevermore to take its lovely
pictures — and transferred its SD card to the beautiful A610.
...
But
behold, it is resurrected with blue
tape
and will stumble-on in the silly camera collection as long as it shall
wave. ... The blue tape isn’t ideal
— well it’s never exactly ideal,
but with cameras which
have a separate door for the film the blue tape’ll just close the
battery compartment. But I did change the film anyway, ’cause the
first
laboratory sample wouldn’t go, and the blue tape came-off and went
back on without much struggle. ... A tasteful invigorating solution.
...
But sadly it lasted not the weary night, and the tape came off; if I
have to make a special effort to tape it just
right, and it worked,
that’d take all the fun out of it anyway. ... On
to the tripod mount!
... Which, sadly,
didn’t
really work any better. Even if I was a
master metal/plastic artisan and could fashion some cunning gadget that
just
fit, still the monstrous
force the stupid little camera’s battery
compartment exerts’ll probably undo the mostly-plastic fixture. And
of
course it’s really ugly — not at all up to the gay æsthetic
of the
blue tape....
The
Abusive Screwdriver
Maybe
I’ll try to do something about the battery springs. ... While poking
in there, I at last
noticed that even ’though broken, the battery door is “more”
closed if
it gets pushed back in a little, which I had apparently not detected
through endless blue tapery, and the blue tape seems to work
better that way, actually surviving the night! And it seems the 3/4“
flavor of painters tape works better than
the wider stuff — so I can see
that the door is in the right position as I tape it. ...
And then I abused the battery springs viciously with a crude
screwdriver
and they definitely settled down a bit. ... So now it will be
perfect. At least for a few precious days ... or hours. It’s
certainly odd how these pitiful battery doors afflict me and
their
occasional partial renovation gives such simple-minded joy. ...
I do so
want them to live and
take pictures, and I haven’t the faintest idea why. ... And
perhaps the astonishingly virile battery springs are an explanation
for the frightful fatality rate of silly camera battery doors. ...
Perhaps it was some dubious manufacturing strategery to make sure the
dopey
user’s batteries’ll work no matter how
stupid he is....
The
Cable Tie
But then at last the Perfect Solution appears,
when the
student is ready. ... Cable
ties!
I had to use two — to make it long-enough; I ordered a longer flavor
— and I didn’t place the “knots” optimally, but
still
it’s obviously a lovely fix that will undoubtedly stand the test
of
time and tide. ... To be sure, it probably wouldn’t’ve worked
without abusive screwdriving,
but as it is, I can
probably even squish it around a bit and open
the door! ... Ah the wonders of Science, the Holy. ... Sadly, the
sacred cable tie only works on the obliging camera; some are doomed to
the inherently temporary blue tape. But then, all the silly cameras, at
least the non-Canon flavor, have outstandingly temporary aspects,
including amazing battery life and
battery door survival rates....
|
Remembrance
of things past
The byways and overgrown wandering paths of
American junk stores
and random web rumors throw-up an occasional precious remnant of the
dearly-departed
digital
cameras’
golden
age,
which I will treasure and heap
with delighted scorn. ...
Also of course see the torrid adventures of my Canon A540s
... and mysterious travails
with the A1200 and A650.
...
I should note that the golden age camera fan should know the name
of its desiderata; just googling “used
canon cameras” infallibly shows-up vast herds of
relatively-recent
expen$ive
junk, but “Canon
A650”
led me (@ 12/26/16) directly to a ~$110 amazon hit (for which I
eventually
splurged $170 in a pricier
season).
4/16. In a
preliminary warmup, before I realized my life’s mission to recover
the world’s low-rent digital camera saga slipping so shamefully into
oblivion, I stumbled across the
8/05
Canon
five
megapixel
A610
at
a junk store, in America, with batteries,
manual!,
a 512 megabyte
SD card and two
beautiful pictures, of the junk store — and aperture / shutter
priority / manual modes — i.e. a
working
mode wheel — and
so
much more! ... And a viewfinder
of course, or I wouldn’t’ve
bothered. ... Its sister cameras, the A620 through A650,
had seven
to 12
mp, but I got the cheap seats for $16....
Yesterday’s point ’n’ shoots,
even my broken A540,
still take
lovely pictures, at
least to my déclassé
taste —
even my
pitiful Nikon viewfinderless
L22 (2010),
whose battery door latch broke
off,
still had beautiful
pictures inside.
... While
I will of course observe the religious
pieties and worship my treasured DSLR
and its wildly
pricey descendants & cohorts,
at least in a
would-be amusingly hypocritical
way, the cheap older toys are just so nice.
... So unpretentious;
so friendly.
... And indeed in the day they were a considerable bit more hostile —
$100s more:
the
A610 was $250 MSRP.
But it was $30 used @
amazon (~9/16?), so I still
got a bargain.
...
And
oh be still
my beating heart
—
the A610 has a
tiltable
rotating
LCD screen, so I can run
out of batteries in the finest
style! ... I replaced the A610’s 512mb card
with the vast 2gb broken Nikon
SD,
and I can
still see
the Nikon
12mp
pictures on
the beautiful LCD. ... And I can take 729 more
pitiful 5mp pictures.
... I am so
lucky....

8/16.
For
our
first official
memory lane diversion, let’s give a senseless
silly camera
welcome to the 4/05
4mp
Samsung
Digimax
A402
— still for sale
@
amazon
prime for
$120! (10/12/16; later visits got $40.) ... There’s a lovely macro
mode with the canonical
tulip
LCD
indicator, but unfortunately nothing in the manual on how to turn it
off
— it’s a plastic
ring
around the lens, probably so it’d look like it had at least one
fancy feature ... or maybe it actually focuses the lens or something.
... An ugly small blot of dead LCD pixels doesn’t affect operation,
once I figured-out the fuzziness was the macro setting. ... The A402
is
heart-breakingly cute ... but
no viewfinder; and
phony digital
zoom....

9/16.
Next up is
the
also-4-megapixel 1/05
4mp
Kodak 5x zoom
EasyShare
Z700
—
with
a viewfinder, and a real
5x zoom, and dpreview claimed amazon has it for only $368.88 (amazon’s
contemporary pre-owned prices were from $39.99 @ 6/17). My
junk store got
$30 from me, but the Z700 had its little Kodak
promotional stickers still intact, and the
SD
has a few out-of-focus shots along with an image or two of the
canonical kindly
junk store lady. ... It came with a Kodak “KAA2HR” rechargeable
battery
pack in it, which presumably might recharge via a micro USB (?)
receptacle
—
oops, wait, ol’ perfidious kodak
just couldn’t resist, and used a wacko receptacle for the USB cable
which
I’ve duly ordered from Amazon for $6 — nope nope just didn’t
calibrate
my
Kodak perfidy good, or I suppose I could’ve read the manual, although
that’s
hardly reliable....
No, the USB cable
doesn’t
seem to power the camera or
charge it; it just connects it to your computer when you’re
feeling
suicidal,
and the cute proprietary Kodak
battery
pack is so I could buy a
custom charger which even Amazon is vague about. So I’ll stick with
my
readily-available/rechargeable NiMH AAs and keep the pitiful little
cable/battery as yet another precious silly camera memento (but see
further
easyshare
adventures). ... At
least it wasn’t
the
proprietary battery scam I momentarily dreaded after
I installed some AAs
the wrong way three times but, no, sigh, all is well and the camera
lights-up in beauty.
And when
I changed the batteries in latter days,
I realized why
it’s do difficult:
(1.) the little printed illustration is obscured
by the batteries so once I put the left one in, I can’t see
it; and (2.) the illustration so-ingeniously shows how the batteries
would
look if you were inside
the camera at the bottom of the battery well — not, as the entire
rest
of the world does in such cases, how the batteries should look once
they’re inserted. When of course I can’t see the
illustration
anyway, I suppose. ... Moving right along from Kodak incompetence to
scammery:
there’s
an imitation filter screw thread around the lens! ... If you could
actually
mount
anything there it would be broken-off when the camera lens extended as
it does @ every power-on, but the Kodak scamster boffins figured
people’d think the thread makes it a more “sophisticated”
camera, and
so thoughtfully ginned-up an imitation.
Anyway,
according to dpreview
it’s got aperture/shutter priority! Menu-based no doubt, ’cause
no
mode-wheel positions — but I lie; there’s the “PAS”
aka “Program Aperture
Shutter” position, which position produces a handy menu on the
bottom of the
screen. ... But it still honors the
digital camera’s
— and especially Kodak’s
—
highest
ideal 3-minute
battery life
with its power-annihilating “Live
view” — which I could turn off, but only in “auto”
mode; all the other thronging modes including the adept’s “PAS”
ignore
the “Live View” setting and light-up the battery-draining
halogen bright LCD for your battery-destruction pleasure. ...
But wait!
There is
an “LCD”
button!
... So I can’t default
Live
View “off” for anything but auto, but I can
turn it off, with the button, if I remember. It’s probably like that
’cause Kodak’s low-rent software afrits were unable to distinguish
between the necessary menu elements — essential in the PAS mode and
presumably others — and the halogen bright LCD “Live”
view. ... So sad.
... But cute....
|

I
bought a broken 2/99
(!) Olympus
“Camedia” 2mp C-2000
Z
for $2 or so at a local group garage sale around 6/2016 — not realizing
it was really the opening shot in the great silly camera collection to
come....
The viewfinder
was
obviously
gershtunk,
and the camera got resurrected amidst
the constant search for
new junk to conquer
around 3/17 when I was considering various Olympus
cameras and their dubious SmartMedia
electronic film which, all on its own, eminently
qualifies
for association with the
silly camera collection. The format disappeared pretty early
in the march of foto fraud, although the wikipedia article
is mute as to dates — but be sure to see the “Format errors
and
data loss” section.
... PC
USB
readers for SmartMedia are not common;
I found one
at
amazon — oh so sad it’s “currently unavailable”,
but
there appear to be
others; try “USB SmartMedia SM XD card reader” in the amazon
search
field.
... However, I will persevere, and make
the silly camera collection safe for
StupidMedia cameras —
although I’ll probably stay away from the special battery scams;
oddly,
the C2000 takes AAs.
... I should note Olympus was a piker
in this field compared to Sony,
whose cameras not
only used proprietary
“memory
sticks” but also battery/chargers; I
assume Olympus just didn’t have the industrial oomph to scam
batteries, although at least one Olympus I’ve encountered had an
obscure
battery,
at least. ... And of course all the sacred DSLRs
et al
use proprietary batteries/chargers....
The
Astonishingly Silly FlashPath Gadget
Fortunately
my StupidMedia
reader appeared in a little while, because I was unable to get
an even stupider
option going,
the
amazing diskette-based FlashPath
gadget, $9.99 at amazon, windows 98/XP/Windows 2000 drivers included.
My up-to-date 2011 windows 7 USB diskette drive saw it not; which, to
be sure, was warned-of on the internet jungle drums. ... But
it is a
precious artifact of the times and, after all, it was pretty
clever
of
Toshiba et al to provide a USB-like attachment hack in 1999, when
the other
cameras — and I know,
I
was there — had appalling
RS-232
barely-working
schemes. ... But of course this one doesn’t work either....
2/18:
The eternal struggle
It continues, and I learned
-
Using
any
Windows computer — or
MSDOS
before it — without a file browser
like my DOS-compatible Owenview
or Owenshow
(or midnight
commander;
not
windows file explorer) is nearly impossible. Because I am a reckless
fool, I got hold of a ~12/01 Windows 98SE computer, but I blew it up by
some evil flaw in my necromancy mumbo-jumbo, and now its USB ports are
no more, and its ethernet probably never got as far as dying the death.
So I am reduced to using the command-line + the unspeakable ez-icky-poo
Usux™ trash. ... I may strive to get the thing back into the world
of
light someday ... but probably not soon.
-
The flashpath
junk didn’t work, probably because the stuff was written before the
w98
computer’s natal day, i.e., the flashpath’s 1/99, the computer
12/01,
so it’s almost 3 whole years! ... Hopeless, presumably. And the manual
is surely one of the worst in a hideously-crowded field: the contents
are at page 26 with no intervening indication, obliging one, in the
ancient always-the-way-with-stupid-software, to go through the stupid
thing page by page, glancing over the prohibitions in three popular
languages about operating the device in gasoline and other helpful
information before finding the slightest clue to how it’s supposed
to
work.
And even
then, there was
no explanation of how to actually use
the software. ... But I lie; there was, on page 68. Step #1 describes
how to run the “Flashpath Status Monitor” from the beloved
Windows
start menu / programs. But then steps #2 & #3, and the
beautiful
illustration, reveal that there might be an icon on the task bar that
starts it. So step #1 is for those of us who wish to use the stupidest
possible way, which didn’t work — I just tried it again.
...
Anyway, clicking
the stupid icon did indeed bring-up the monitor, which denied all
knowledge of the flashpath diskette-like object I had inserted. And was
apparently written in my beloved Delphi.
There
are more recent versions of the flashjunk software, and I tried one,
downloaded from a genuine Olympus website, which installed and the
resulting hidden program looked
different, but saw no flashpath diskette gadget could it find. ... My
next
pointless excursion might well involve installing a 3½’’ drive
into my
beloved malwaresque HP derelict desktop.
Or
not....
Resurrection!
But
since I had gone through the trouble of procuring the amazing StupidMedia
cards, I put one in the C2000, and Lo!
— it
worked!
... Even the “defective” viewfinder sprang back to a slightly
speckled
life:
apparently before, without power, it was showing the focus of the retracted lens, and
that makes it a high-class
feature
instead of a broken viewfinder, and the wonders never cease.
... And the USB stupidmedia reader
showed-up and worked wonderfully!
... My beautiful ~2mp
Olympus jpgs in all their
stunning glory. ... And now, flush with StupidMedia capability, I can
buy
more cameras!
|

10/16.
Infrared adventures
led me
to
the inspiring 4/05
Canon
5mp
S2
IS 12x zoomer,
a mere $55
(used of
course) at Amazon!
Might’ve been $300 in the day. ... Maybe I should’ve
got one of these instead of my stupid zoomer
— the S2’s got 12x zoom
’n’
image stabilization
and shutter and
f-stop
settings ’n’ everything! ... Of course
the S2 was
supposedly $460 (?) and only 5mp, and the Kodak’s
got 30x zoom, so
maybe
I wasn’t so
stupid, although the S2 should’ve got cheaper by 2011 — but
I was
ignorant, which is how the racket works. (But I really should’ve
got
the sx20 — or
the s3!)
... But now,
through the
magic of
accelerated retrospective enthusiast camera acquisition I get a redo,
and
really, megapixels are
so
yesterday
— after my 1mp
DC3200
in 2001 I didn’t care — unless I wanted
to blow-up
something.
... Indeed after I got the thing working
and took some pictures, and discovered the pernicious digital
zoom was
enabled and, after suppressing it, decided to do the all-important
reset everything function — and then
I discovered I’d been taking 2mp pictures! And how little difference
it made, at least in the Faststone
browser — neither
picture size fit on my 1980x1080 “Full HD” screen, and clicking
them to
see a 100% view and scroll around hardly seemed to make much
difference....
The gaff is all-but-obvious in contemporary photo
puffery magazines, where every page glamorizes how you’ll want to
print
your
beautiful creations as large as anything! Why, you’re hardly a photographer if you
don’t print lots of big
junk. ... Which must be my problem — even
before the
cameras, I was a digital kind of guy
and wasn’t really into printing stuff so much — maybe
I got all blasé from working in the biz.
... And after all, we all
sit in front of these screens, and most of us — not me, to be sure
—
live & work in wretched cubicles — so what’s all this
printing stuff?!
... Well my children it’s so the sneaky
merchandisers
can sell
the cameras,
see? — not to mention the printers — otherwise you might as
well use your phone. ... And actually
when I printed my S2 infrared picture,
it didn’t
look good
until I cropped it a
lot to highlight the ghostly palms in the center. ... Probably my cheap
crummy printer. But I needed the pixels for the crop....
S2
Tragedy!???
Oh
so sad!
... It was broken and
only displayed a “NO IMAGE” message — which for some
reason I concluded
was supposed to mean
a TV was plugged
into the tiny socket which of course wasn’t. But I was wracked
with guilt & anxiety that I wasn’t clever-enough
to figure-out how the stupid thing worked,
just like my “working”
A540
tragedy. ... And so it was,
silly enthusiast that I am,
it actually
says “NO IMAGE” when the SD card’s empty!
... Of course!
... I was such
a fool!
... Well really the S2’s adorable and quaint, and the power button
is
a
two-way affair, one way of which sets it to play the images on the SD
card, which is when it says “NO IMAGE” if you just put
in a
blank new SD card like I did. ... I must work on my
hair-trigger
return-the-junk tendencies....
So
to make up for my gormless cluelessness,
I bought it a 58mm adapter which is supposed
to let me use my beloved DSLR
toys and especially the superlatively
silly infrared
filter with the beautiful Canon S2 IS,
like the infrared guy
did — but my $13 brandx adapter was probably cheaper than his ....
S2
Stupidity!???
3/4/18. Somehow in my continuing
neglect I actually left some alkaline AAs in there, and they rotted,
and I had to scrape out green stuff with a dental pick and apply deoxit
before the screen’d stop saying “recharge the batteries”
when I put in
decent charged NiMH
AAs. ... Oh the shame the degradation. ... This at the time of the sx30
crisis, providing some
insight into why
Canon’d adopt proprietary batteries (as in the sx30) as opposed to
decent ol’ AAs — that is, aside
from screw-the-customer greed — because the proprietary thing’d
protect
idiots from leaving alkaline batteries inside....

2/17.
In a demented burst of completism, I got a $31 amazon 8/06
Canon
8mp
A630
($295 new!), so I’ve got a spectrum
of
Canon A6s: 610/630/650.
... I’ve made its space in the silly camera collection and I’m
sure it’ll
be wonderful whenever it turns-up — and so it is! Except the auto-lens
cover thing was sticky and stuck at ⅕
or so
open,
but I heroically cleaned it with antique
Kodak lens cleaner + a lens
cloth + a derelict toothbrush, and now it works perfectly and will
do so forever! ... Probably why it was cheaper than previous rumors.
The
Attachments
...
& then, like the true fan-boy hobbyist idiot I am, or at least
aspire
to be, I
finally noticed the whole A6 series has an attachment
feature, so one can install meretricious behavior-modifying lens
gadgets
that won’t
work with the
optical viewfinder, thus requiring
the battery-draining LCD.
... So I must get
some! ... Indeed, my beloved
ur-silly camera the A540 has the feature, which I have cruelly
neglected/not-noticed since I bought the broken thing in 2006! ...
So I will scour the junk marts of amazon for suitable
treats. ... These
attachment gadgets are different
for the various silly cameras, even in the same series. And I had
assumed/hoped the gadget-mounting end of the attachment at least would
all be 58mm like the beloved S2,
which matches
the
DSLR kit
lens and its
silly add-on toys — the S2,
incidentally
is the only one with an EVF
so I don’t
have to
drain the battery for attachment excitement. ... But no; there
are at least some 52mm.
...
And the a610-a640
range doesn’t
use the same adapter, so I had to return the fabulously fraudulent
amazon
gadget which asserted that claim and didn’t
fit my a630 or 610. Although I must
say,
reviews of two
such products —
i.e. which claim
the
620
through 640 range use the same adapter — say it works great. Probably
all fake — even “verified purchases” would only cost
the sneaky
merchandiser whatever % amazon takes for one or two fraudulent reviews.
... And so I will recommend “snapitdigital”
in Brooklyn (!) who I googled-up on ebay
(!) and
who managed to send me a working
52mm / A540 attachment gadget with telephoto + wide-angle for a mere
$40 what showed-up in a week or two. And I learned that not only must I
turn-on the LCD, but that I can’t
use the flash,
’cause the lens thingey sticking-out casts a shadow. ... This is
the
kind of important professional insight you can’t get from
those magazines.
...
And finally I got a 760nm infra-red filter with a 52mm thread, so I can
take
exquisite 12mp
infra-red
pictures with my a650
at least....
|

3/2/17.
An 8/03
Nikon 3mp
Coolpix
3100
3x zoom was $20 used @ amazon (only $350
list), and it came with
a
box — “pocket full of pixels” it gaily promises —
manual, and accessory cables! And a
compact
flash
with summer + winter
w/grandpa pix, presumably ~ 2003; he
never set-up the camera date/time. ... But it
takes lovely pictures, like all the silly cameras.
... & I am minded
of the cultic path: the seeker buys practically
any camera since ~2001 or so, and when it’s not “good”
enough,
he’s conned into buying a “better”
camera. But his pictures aren’t
defective;
they’re boring,
because most
picture are boring, but some kind of jedi/zen hermetic rigor will
convince
him that $Ks
in
cameras’ll make interesting
pictures,
at last. ... And such is the one-fold way....
But the lovely picture of the 2003
suburban cul-de-sac is
interesting
... somehow....
|

3/20/17.
A 4/01
~2mp
Canon
PowerShot A20
3x zoom, also $20 used @ amazon. ... List price $600! — no wonder
I didn’t buy these things in the day. But it has all the features,
white balance, continuous shots, macro, etc etc. ... And I got 256
pictures
left
to take on the 256Mb compact
flash
generously included in the $20.
And I was shocked to discover the A20 pictures
looking fuzzier
than the rest of the herd! ... But it was just acute foto fan
confusion,
due in the first place by the 640x480 (VGA
resolution) pictures that the A20 was set to when I got it. Then after
that got belatedly fixed, I’d accidentally enlarge a decent 2mp
pictures to 100% or worse and of course it’d look all pixelated.
but when I reduced the pictures (i.e. in paint/viewer software) to look
“normal”,
i.e.
centered on half or a third of the screen, widely-varying
megapixel pictures looked comparably sharp.
... To put this another
way, the
2mp pictures’ apparent
resolution is limited by the “low” resolution of my modern-bog-standard
“HD”
1920x1080 LCD
screens, and I could doubtless
waste money on ever higher resolution
27’’-and-up LCDs that would reveal the inadequacies of 2001
two megapixel
cameras much
better. Except I
don’t want to do that — I mean, even the wildy
scammy
enthusiast
photo magazines
don’t
dare suggest it.
Tragedy
Thu
5/21/20. And then in the tragic march of the
years, my poor A20 died
— while investigating the wonders of the S20,
I went to examine the precious object and found it frozen,
without
life, an apparent victim of battery rot, probably because I had
foolishly neglected it, probably leaving the seller’s batteries in
there and not checking them. ... At least I hope so; the A10
I got later was
completely copacetic, with its properly-installed NiMH
AAs happily intact. ... Now, with heavy-laden sorrow, I will attempt
to crack-open the poor little camera, which makes my heart ache. ...
And then even that I gave-up, and it will hang amongst the
ever-burgeoning broken camera collection, by its pitiful lanyard. ...
Of
course I bought another one @ amazon.
...
And my new/old A20 came in lazy covid
time @ 5/27/20 & frightened
me! ... It lit up in japanese!
... I had to read the
manual
to find out how to set the language — “blind” as it were
— but I did,
and now it is a totally copacetic primitive digital silly camera of the
ages. ... But this time I definitely
put in NiMH AAs....
Reprieve!
3/19/21.
And then the weary covid
years whirled around me again, and with the aid of brute force and an
amazingly useful
tool called a “Watch Case
Back Opener” I abused
my
original A20 open, cleaned it mercilessly with 3-in-1 oil +
dremel-brush + battery-toothbrush + dental pick excavation, and it
sings again! ... So all
is well in the silly vales....
|

3/22/17.
A 5/02
3mp
Olympus
C-720 Ultra-Zoom 8z
zoom, a hefty $37 at the amazon previously-owned
wonder emporium
... but $600 list! ... And it has a lens
cover,
which is so much cooler than the other point ’n’ shoots’
self-covering
retracting lenses, although this one still retracts — well actually
I see my Olympus C-2000 should’ve
had a lens cover, exhibiting shocking naked glass even at retracted
power-off. The 720, also, uses the wondrous StupidMedia,
a mark of antique distinction, soon disappearing in the
mists of the wandering years. ... And of
course they both
take beautiful
pictures, like all
the silly cameras. ... And then I belatedly realized the C-720 has an EVF,
the luxurious little
thing.
|
3/27/17.
In a perfectly respectable effort to bring more silly into the silly
camera collection, March Maddness continues with a $29.99 1/00
3mp
Nikon
Coolpix 990
with a 3x zoom. It is
silly, but really, more stupid; the rotating thing seems mostly
annoying — although while the manual hasn’t heard of “selfies”,
the
camera can easily take one, but then lots of non-wacko cameras with
cute rotating LCDs could too.
The cp990 came with
a 1/3-full 1mb CF card,
but the photography’s not as
high-toned as my Nikon 3100,
being images of the
probably-youthful photographer’s family / friends. Although as the
pictures appear on the laboratory’s extensive screen saver array,
they
kind-of grow on me. ... And I think I’ve finally got one
of
these things that’s actually broken,
at least the manual seems to think the optical viewfinder
should track
the zoom like a decent Canon point ’n’ shoot, but it doesn’t,
and makes
sad groaning noises
instead....
Innerestingly, the camera in its day was priceless:
the
totally-unbiased impartial reviews
all
omit a price, no doubt at the strict totally-unbiased impartial behest
of Nikon.
... So I will assume it was $1,000 originally — which is not
farfetched,
maybe even low. It’s three
megapixels
& the year 2000. ... Well OK that’s unlikely; probably a mere
$700 or $800, like the year 2000 3mp
Canon cameras. Although the cp990’s got the special feature stupid
rotating thing....
|
3/29/17.
In perhaps the final episode of March deMentia, an extravagant $40
bought me a 7/03
5mp Sony
DSC-V1
with proprietary battery (Sony NP-FC11 3.6V 2.8WH) and
proprietary memory stick that can’t be read
in my entire collection of readers (two; memory stick “pro”?).
But the $40 also got a charger
and a standard (!) mini-USB cable which, plugged into the camera,
produces
the Sony pictures as an external drive
and transferred OK — which is astonishingly less
screw-the-customer than the 2011 Kodak.
...
Also I got a precious original box, and a brandx camera bag.
But I think this may be my furthest excursion
into the magic of proprietary scammery (hah!). And the camera of course
was
priceless, but originally ~$700!
compared to the ~$800?!
6/03
Canon 5mp
powershot G5 — see, Sony’d charge less,
and
then screw the
customer with proprietary accessories — which they all do to be sure,
to a greater or lesser extent, a grand foto fan frenzy cult tradition.
...
It’s almost
amusing, reading
the amazon reviewers of various would-be
memory stick readers, and the authoritarian know-it-all who explains
how it reads perfectly
well, it just won’t read “pro” memory
sticks, as if “what’d you expect!?!?! ”
—
although they obviously fit
into the memory
stick slot in my pitiful
readers.
The Adorable Memory Stick
And here’s
a thoughtful analysis of various memory cards including the beloved
memory stick ... search the page for “memory stick”. ... As
the
feisty
columnist Dvorak said of Windows
10, “I’m
amazed it works at all”. ... Once there was an official Sony website
with the most astonishing chart
but it’s gone away now. So I put a link in the picture to a
kind-of PDF rendition from somewhere around www.gradientiens.com. This
is a much larger travesty courtesy speedyspares.com. Bon
appétit!
... Anyway, I think
I’ve learned that my adorable memory stick is indeed the “pro”
—
not the
“pro duo” which of course is an entirely different component,
only
to be used/accessed with an extravagantly-obscure adapter hardly known
to
man nor camera. ... And I bought another
$7.99-at-least usb reader, what an amazon
commenter
claimed read his
memory stick pro; which will
be delivered, appropriately, on 4/1. ... And it
works! So I bought some more....
Anyway, amazon had some battery/charger things
supposedly for the
DSC-V1 Sony
NP-FC11 3.6V 2.8WH battery, so I bought one for $12. ... The
card reader after all is just luxury;
if I have some kind of mental
convulsion
and buy another
Sony camera — but then its memory sticks wouldn’t be compatible
anyway
— apparently they never are. ... But so long as I can power-on this Sony, I can
get the pictures out
of it. ... But I must admit, a working card reader, when I finally
broke
down and got one, feels
wonderful. ... No doubt traumatic stress disorder from the days
with rs232 and the eye of a newt. ... And I must admit that through all
these enthralling Sony adventures, I failed to realize that I could
charge the battery in
the camera with the AC adapter supplied by the kindly
amazon merchant. ... I also didn’t notice the “faux”
screw
threads on the lens plastic, fairly standard in scammy cameras.
|

More
silly cameras, II &
III

  


|